Discrepancy Report

2022 General Election, Burlington County, NJ

Audit Engine version:'20e5a4f'

Run Date: 2023-06-30 20:05:10.810374 Copyright (c) Citizens' Oversight

Introduction
Metadata Summary
Summary of Discrepancy Records
Contest Discrepancy Report
Precinct Report
Unprocessed Ballots Report

Introduction

This report is the result of comparing the official Cast Vote Records (CVR) with the result by AuditEngine.

One of the key differences between ballot image audits, most specifically with the analysis provided by AuditEngine, and other types of auditing, is that the comparison between the results from AuditEngine and the official results occurs for all ballots at the ballot level, and we also compare with any adjudications as well.

Definitions

Sheets -- Each ballot image comprises a single paper sheet, including both sides. This is the case even if multiple sheets are included in the logical ballot. Individual ballot sheets that include a number of contests. The number of sheets in tables is not necessarily a direct sum because a single sheet may include multiple contests. Also, depending on the number of sheets included in a single logical ballot, the number of ballots cast may be less than the total number of sheets, and it may be hard to predict because subsequent sheets are commonly not included in the logical ballot cast. Counting the first sheet will usually produce a pretty accurate number, but even then, some voters do not include the first sheet either.
Contest or Ballot-Contest -- On each sheet, there are a number of contests. A single contest on a single ballot is a "ballot-contest" and sometimes just "contest" in this context. This is not the entire contest with all votes from all ballots summed, but simply the evaluation of that single contest on that sheet. Frequently, these can be called "votes", except that sometimes a single contest will allow multiple votes.
Write-in -- If the write-in oval is marked or if the write-in area is filled in, then it is considered that the voter intent is to write-in the name for some other candidate.
How this is handled is specific to different states, but most often, the written-in name must also be from a list of qualified write-in candidates.
Write-ins on BMD ballots do not need human-eye adjudication at this stage because the names are keyed in.
The name written-in should be examined in close contests even if there were no candidates that were qualified for this contest, because the name written-in may be of a listed candidate, and if so, then the vote is accepted for that listed candidate.
Write-ins normally account for about 80% of Contest Variants. At this stage, most jurisdictions do not fully filter whether the name written-in is a qualified write-in candidate, but may do so during adjudication.
Overvotes -- One overvote occurs when more than the "vote-for" number are selected. Overvotes do not happen on BMD ballots. Very frequently, overvotes are misinterpreted by the voting system and should be fully reviewed in close contests. If a contests has an overvote, it will be first classified as an overvote, even when the write-in target is selected. Some election departments will mark overvotes as an undervote when they are confirmed as an overvote. AuditEngine understands this form of adjudication and does not regard it as a disagreement.
AuditEngine will correctly interpret many marks that would be considered undervotes by voting systems, such as when ovals are circled or if a checkmark does not actually get inside the oval.
Adjudicated -- For some voting systems, such as Dominion, the CVR may also provide not only the original evaluation of the ballot sheet, but also a 'modified' record which includes all contests on the ballot. The 'modified' record may modify zero or many contests after human-eye review by election staff. If the modified record does not show a change in a given contest, it is not possible to know from that record if the contest was inspected and confirmed or not.
Disagreed -- a contest is considered "disagreed" unless the voting system and AuditEngine fully agree on the outcome, including whether it was overvoted, undervoted, or had write-ins. Since write-ins and overvotes are frequently reviewed and adjudicated by election staff, disagreed write-ins and overvotes are treated together in terms of analysis. "Normal Disagreed" are the rest of the disagreed, which are not write-ins or overvotes.
Fully Agreed Sheets -- A ballot sheet is classified as Fully Agreed if ithas no write-ins, overvotes, and gray-flags, and it also every contest fully agrees between the evaluation of the voting system and AuditEngine. Such sheets are maintained as a single record but keep track of the number and which contests are on them.
Partially Agreed Sheets -- If a ballot sheet has at least one contest-variant detected, then that contest variant is logically pulled from this comparison record, and what remains are the rest of the non-variant contests. Note that if all contests are considered contest-variants, then it will be an empty shell with no contests left in it, and all contest variants will be moved to the contest-variants set.
Contest Variant -- A contest variant is a ballot-contest which has write-ins, overvotes, is gray-flagged, or if it is 'disagreed', i.e. if there is any disagreement between the evaluation of the vote by AuditEngine and the official result. (Undervotes are not included in the set unless they are disagreed.) Contest Variants can normally be summed by contest. Each contest variant has a separate record for each ballot-contest instance.
Unprocessed -- Unprocessed sheets are those that were NOT successfully processed by AuditEngine. These are generally due to images that are damaged due to 'stretching' of the image when the sheet is not evenly fed through the scanner, barcodes that were corrupted and unreliable, or BMD ballots that were not perfectly read using OCR. Cleaning the scanner rollers can help to avoid corrupted images. AuditEngine does not track contests on unprocessed sheets.
Ballot Variant -- If a complete sheet is blank or if the image was detected as corrupted, then this is classified as a ballot-variant.
Images Missing -- Sometimes we can't access all the images and so these are accounted for as images missing. AuditEngine does not attempt to sum the contests on ballot images that are missing.

Record Types Used by AuditEngine

Fully Agreed: One record per sheet which has all the contests on that sheet, when they are Fully Agreed and there are no contest variants at all.
Partially Agreed: One record per sheet that includes the contests that have not been pulled and "moved" to the contest-variant list because they are disagreed, or have overvotes, write-ins, or gray-flags.
Contest-Variants: A separate record for each ballot-contest that is disagreed, or has overvotes, write-ins, or gray-flags.
Ballot-Variants: One record per sheet that is completely blank or is corrupted. These may be partially included in the Fully Agreed set (when they are agreed and fully blank).

The Discrepancy Report includes columns for both Sheets and Contests. Please note that a given sheet may include several variant contests, and one sheet may be included in different categories. Thus, the total number of sheets is not always a direct sum of the sheets in each category, and in some cases it is listed as a direct sum and that is only an estimate rather than an exact value.

These comparison records can then be used to produce the discrepancy report.

High Level Reconciliation

parameter	images	cvrs	images-cvrs	results	results-images
num_files	1	0
raw_total	51,798	0	51,798	167,067	115,269
repeated ballot_ids	0	0	0
net unique ballot_ids	51,798	0	51,798	167,067	115,269
net unique BMD Ballots	0	0	0
net unique nonBMD Ballots	51,798	0	51,798
net unique residue	0
repeated sheets	0	0	0
repeated BMD Ballots	0	0	0
repeated nonBMD Ballots	0	0	0
repeated residue	0	0
net unique sheets	51,798	0	51,798	167,067	115,269
net unique sheets in common	0	0	0
net unique sheets not in common	0	0

Metadata Summary

Parameter	Value
Election Name	2022 General Election, Burlington County, NJ
Official Ballots Cast	167,067
Number of precincts	0
Number of parties	0
Number of contests	124
Number of styles	460
Number of hexstyles (patterns of contests)	0
Number of BMD ballots	0
Number of different sheets	0
---- Ballot Image Archives (BIAs) ----	--------------------
Number of BIA Ballot Archives	1
Unique ballot_ids in BIAs	51,798
Total number of records in BIAs	51,798
Num. kept repeated ballot_ids in BIAs	0
Num. skipped repeated ballot_ids in BIAs	0
Num. skipped repeated images	0
BIA_num (unique images)	51,798
cast_num == BIA_num?	False
ballots cast > BIA by	115,269
ballots in BIA > cast by	0
---- Metadata from Images (BLTs) ----	--------------------
BLT_unique_ballots_num	51,798
Total number of BLT bif records	51,798
Duplicate BLT ballot_ids	0
ballotids in BLT == BIA?	True
ballots cast not in BLT	115,269
Number of card_codes	460
Number of ballots with no card_codes	0

Summary of Discrepancy Records

This first section is an election-wide review of the ballots that are considered

High Level Reconciliation

Record Type	Sheets	Ballot Contests	% of Sheets	% of Contests	Description
Fully Agreed Sheets	48,590	309,333	93.8%	93.8%	Ballot sheets which are 'plain' and have no contest variants at all. Please note that undervotes are frequently present and are not considered a reported variation.
Partially Agreed Sheets	3,202	16,515	6.2%	5.0%	Records of ballot sheets which originally contained variant contests, but where those variant contests have been logically 'removed' from the number of contests that remain on the sheets. The remaining contests and sheets listed here are 'agreed' and have no overvotes, writeins or gray_flags. The number of contests listed in this group are those that remain and are all plain (non-variant).
Subtotal Agreed	51,792	325,848	100.0%	98.8%	Total agreed or partially agreed sheets and total of agreed ballot-contests. These counts are accurate for both Sheets and Contests.
Contest Variants	- -	4,026	6.2%	1.2%	Ballot-Contests excluded from partially agreed ballot sheets that have variations at the contest level. These will be further broken down based on the reason for the variation. Contest Variants includes write-ins, overvotes, and disagreementsand are not included in "Fully Agreed" or "Partially Agreed"
Unprocessed	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Ballots that were NOT successfully processed by AuditEngine. These are generally due to images that are damaged due to 'stretching' of the image when the page is not evenly fed through the scanner, barcodes that were corrupted and unreliable, or BMD ballots that were not perfectly read using OCR. Cleaning the scanner rollers can help to avoid corrupted images.
Ballot Variants	9	- -	0.017%	0.0045%	Ballot sheets that have deviations at the ballot level, style mismatch, no-cvr, or blank).
Images Missing	0	- - -	0.0%	0.0%	Ballots that exist in the CVR but are not available as ballot images.
Total	51,801	329,874

AuditEngine Flagged

If no CVR is available for comparison, then these groups are used to drive adjudication to fine tune the result from AuditEngine. These sets only include ballots with images. The group 'ae_uncategorized' were classified as variants based on cvr comparison and not included in the cases detected without any cvr comparison. It is common for this to be a fairly large number of variants. These are analyzed separately below.

Record Type	Sheets	Ballot Contests	% of Sheets	% of Contests	Description
wi	1,317	1,660	2.5%	0.50%	Audit Writeins: Contests per AuditEngine that have writeins and are NOT flagged as 'gray' (NO BMDs).
bmd_wi	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Audit Writeins: Contests per AuditEngine that have writeins and are NOT flagged as 'gray' (BMDs only).
wi_gry	18	22	0.035%	0.0067%	Audit Writeins: Contests per AuditEngine that have writeins and ARE flagged as 'gray' (may be BMDs).
ov	1,890	2,259	3.6%	0.68%	Audit Overvotes: Contests per AuditEngine that are overvoted, are not writeins, and are NOT flagged as 'gray'.
ov_gry	26	36	0.050%	0.011%	Audit Overvotes: Contests per AuditEngine that are overvoted, and ARE flagged as 'gray'.
uv_gry	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Audit Undervotes: Contests per AuditEngine that are undervoted, and ARE flagged as 'gray'.
x_gry	36	49	0.069%	0.015%	Contests flagged as 'gray' by AuditEngine for further review, and do not include writeins or overvotes or undervotes.
ae_uncategorized	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	These contest variants are not independently flagged by AuditEngine but are considered variant due to cvr comparison.
Total	3,287	4,026

Contest Variants Breakdown

This high-level breakdown is based on AuditEngine evaluation.

Record Type	Sheets	Ballot Contests	% of Sheets	% of Contests	Description
wi_unadj	1,332	1,682	2.6%	0.51%	Writeins per AuditEngine, unadjudicated (No BMDs).
bmd_wi_unadj	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Writeins per AuditEngine, unadjudicated (BMDs only).
wi_adj	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Writeins per AuditEngine, adjudicated.
ov_unadj	1,904	2,295	3.7%	0.70%	Overvotes per AuditEngine, unadjudicated.
ov_adj	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Overvotes per AuditEngine, adjudicated.
uv_adj	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Undervotes per AuditEngine, adjudicated.
other_unadj	36	49	0.069%	0.015%	True discrepancies not including writeins, or overvotes, unadjudicated.
other_adj	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	True discrepancies not including writeins, undervotes or overvotes, adjudicated.
cv2_uncategorized	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Any uncategorized cv1 groups
Total	3,272	4,026

Non additive Groups

Record Type	Sheets	Ballot Contests	% of Sheets	% of Contests	Description
Contest Variants	3,202	4,026	0%	0%	Ballot-Contests excluded from partially agreed ballot sheets that have variations at the contest level. These will be further broken down based on the reason for the variation. Contest Variants includes write-ins, overvotes, and disagreementsand are not included in "Fully Agreed" or "Partially Agreed"
Disagreed (combined groups)	-	-	0%	0%	All contests that do not agree between the CVR and Audit result, and may include writeins, overvotes and be flagged as gray.
Ballot Variants	9	15	0%	0%	Ballot sheets that have deviations at the ballot level, style mismatch, no-cvr, or blank).
uncategorized	-	-	0%	0%	Contest Variants that have not been categorized into any groups. This should be empty.
Blank Sheets	3	15	0%	0%	Ballot sheets where no selections are detected. Ex: ['01014_00000_882859_0', '03000_00162_000022', '04001_00019_000004']

Ballot Variants

Completely blank ballots and any that we find had different style in CVR from the ballot.

Record Type	Sheets	Ballot Contests	% of Sheets	% of Contests	Description
Ballot Variants	9	15	0%	0%	Ballot sheets that have deviations at the ballot level, style mismatch, no-cvr, or blank).
Blank Sheets	3	15	0%	0%	Ballot sheets where no selections are detected. Ex: ['01014_00000_882859_0', '03000_00162_000022', '04001_00019_000004']
No CVR	6	- - -	0%	0%	Ballot images that have been detected as corrupted, typically due to slippage during scanning. Ex: ['04001_00012_000001', '04001_00012_000002', '04002_00037_000001', '04002_00037_000002', '04002_00039_000001', '04002_00046_000023']
bv_uncategorized	-	-	0%	0%	Ballot Variants uncategorized. This should be empty.

Gray-flagged agreed votes.

These contests are marked as variants only because AuditEngine noted ambiguous votes or heuristic vote resolution.

Record Type	Sheets	Ballot Contests	% of Sheets	% of Contests	Description
x_x_gry	36	49	1.9%	2.2%	Unadjudicated agreed contests with votes, marked gray_eval
x_x_x_gry	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Adjudicated agreed contests with votes, marked gray_eval
uv_uv_gry	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Unadjudicated Agreed overvotes, flagged as gray (ov_ov_gry).
uv_uv_uv_gry	-	-	0.0%	0.0%	Agreed overvotes confirmed by adjudication, flagged as gray. This tends not to happen if using undervote marking in adjudication.
Total	36	49

Variant list for group:'ov_rest_unadjudicated': first (upto) 50 of 2,295.

ballot_id	contest	a==co	a_ov	a_gy
01004_00000_320317_0	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	1
01007_00000_196350_0	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	1
01007_00000_196350_0	Sheriff (Vote For 1)	1	1	1
01007_00000_196350_0	County Commissioners (Vote For 1)	1	1	1
01007_00000_196350_0	Mount Laurel Township Council (Vote For 2)	1	1	1
01007_00000_533183_0	Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
01015_00000_393697_0	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	1
03000_00002_000016	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00002_000016	Sheriff (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00002_000016	County Commissioners (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00002_000016	Beverly City Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)	1	1	1
03000_00002_000038	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00002_000038	Sheriff (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00002_000038	County Commissioners (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00002_000070	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00002_000072	Beverly City Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)	1	1	0
03000_00003_000065	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00006_000026	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00006_000027	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00006_000028	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000029	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000031	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000031	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000042	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000060	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000062	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000062	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000065	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000074	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00007_000083	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	1
03000_00009_000026	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00009_000041	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00009_000043	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00009_000044	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00009_000045	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00009_000046	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00009_000086	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00010_000001	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00010_000002	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00010_000038	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00010_000055	Sheriff (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00010_000055	County Commissioners (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00010_000084	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00011_000060	Bordentown Twp FD2 Commissioners (Vote For 2)	1	1	0
03000_00011_000061	U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	1	1	0
03000_00011_000074	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00011_000079	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00011_000088	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00011_000089	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0
03000_00011_000099	Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1	1	0

Relevant Settings


include_bmd_ballot_type	True
include_nonbmd_ballot_type	True
cmpcvr_report_agreed_overvotes	False
save_variant_ballots	True
accept_adjudicated_writeins	True

Contest Discrepancy Report

This report is the most revealing in terms of possible changes in the outcome of any contests. Please see the more thorough description of each term in the introduction in this report.

Total: Total ballots cast which included this contest with images that were processed by AuditEngine.
NonVariant: Ballots with this contest where the official outcome and the evaluation by AuditEngine agreed, and did not include write-ins, overvotes, and were not flagged as 'gray'.
Agreed Overvotes: Ballots where both AuditEngine and the voting system detected an overvote.
Agreed Write-ins: Ballots which included write-ins in terms of a marked target, but where the name written-in may not be a qualified write-in candidate, and the write-in may be correctly attributed as a vote for a listed candidate.
Agreed Undervotes: Undervotes are very numerous and we do not break those down here, and are not included in the discrepancy report unless they are disagreed or gray flagged.
Disagreed: These are ballot-contests which were not initially evaluated as overvotes or write-ins, and where the evaluation by AuditEngine disagrees with the voting system.
Gray Only: Ballot-contests where AuditEngine detected an ambiguous mark on this contest or used heuristics to decide voter-intent. This column omits any ballots which are in the columns for write-ins, overvotes, or disagreed ballots, even if AuditEngine internally flags them as gray.
All Variants: Ballots with Agreed Overvotes, Agreed Write-ins, Disagreed, or Gray Flagged. The number of ballots cast should equal the sum of "Plain Agreed", and "All Variants". The components of this column are highlighted.
Disagreed% of Margin This provides a good measure of whether the variants may have any impact on the outcome, and the highest five values are highlighted. Further analysis is still required to see if the disagreements will reduce the current margin of victory.
Variant% of Margin This provides a maximum measure of whether the variants may have any impact on the outcome, and the highest five values are highlighted. Typically, the vast majority (perhaps 90%) of All Variants are Agreed Write-ins and Agreed Overvotes which may only rarely result in any changes in the outcome.
Vote Margin: This is the margin of victory, i.e. gap between votes for runner-up and winner (lowest winner if contest has multiple winners) among the ballots processed, and may be a subset of the total margin for the entire district if AuditEngine did not receive or process all ballot images.

To reduce the report size, precinct details are limited to the first few contests or those contests that were highlighted or are included in the setting 'cmpcvr_report_include_contests'. If you are interested in a specific contest, include it in the setting 'cmpcvr_report_include_contests', which is a list.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	Gray Only	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
U.S. House of Representatives: District 1 (Vote For 1)	1,632	1,615	16	1	0	17	0.00%	1.01%	1,681	23.09%
U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)	50,160	49,767	360	19	14	393	0.00%	1.37%	28,614	18.04%
General Assembly 12th Legislative District UNEX (Vote For 1)	1,492	1,491	1	0	0	1	0.00%	0.17%	586	12.98%
Sheriff (Vote For 1)	51,792	51,723	29	30	10	69	0.00%	0.35%	19,588	12.16%
County Commissioners (Vote For 1)	51,792	51,726	32	21	13	66	0.00%	0.31%	21,513	13.39%
Local BOE- Bass River (Vote For 1)	57	53	0	4	0	4	0.00%	44.44%	9	100.00%
Local BOE-Beverly City (Vote For 2)	159	139	0	20	0	20	0.00%	45.45%	44	100.00%
Bordentown Township Committee (Vote For 1)	1,129	1,123	0	6	0	6	0.00%	0.22%	2,704	96.92%
Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)	1,129	1,077	44	6	2	52	0.00%	50.98%	102	1.27%
Burlington City Council Ward 3 Unex (Vote For 1)	181	178	0	2	1	3	0.00%	0.60%	499	97.65%
Burlington City Bd of Island Mngrs-Manager (Vote For 3)	687	649	34	4	0	38	0.00%	44.71%	85	1.67%
Burlington City Bd of Island Mngrs-Treasurer (Vote For 1)	687	676	0	11	0	11	0.00%	27.50%	40	100.00%
Local BOE-Burlington City (Vote For 3)	687	680	0	7	0	7	0.00%	0.52%	1,353	30.38%
Mayor of Burlington Township (Vote For 1)	2,359	2,358	1	0	0	1	0.00%	0.03%	3,304	41.35%
Burlington Township Council (Vote For 3)	2,359	2,351	4	4	0	8	0.00%	0.26%	3,063	14.28%
Burlington Township Council Unex (Vote For 1)	2,359	2,347	0	12	0	12	0.00%	0.20%	5,913	98.70%
Local BOE-Burlington Twp (Vote For 3)	2,359	2,333	1	25	0	26	0.00%	0.56%	4,647	31.04%
Local BOE-Burlington Twp 1 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	2,359	2,338	0	19	2	21	0.00%	0.41%	5,116	98.12%
Chesterfield Township Committee (Vote For 2)	1,021	1,019	0	2	0	2	0.00%	3.85%	52	1.07%
Chesterfield Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)	1,021	1,008	1	10	2	13	0.00%	0.85%	1,523	47.68%
N. Burlington Regional BOE-Chesterfield Twp (Vote For 1)	1,021	975	39	6	1	46	0.00%	18.25%	252	12.48%
Local BOE-Chesterfield Twp (Vote For 2)	1,021	1,005	0	16	0	16	0.00%	1.06%	1,515	48.57%
Cinnaminson Township Committee (Vote For 1)	1,776	1,741	0	35	0	35	0.00%	0.84%	4,144	96.01%
Local BOE-Cinnaminson Twp (Vote For 3)	1,776	1,658	90	27	1	118	0.00%	124.21%	95	0.65%
Delanco Township Committee (Vote For 2)	533	521	0	12	0	12	0.00%	1.07%	1,122	46.21%
Local BOE-Delanco Twp (Vote For 3)	533	502	25	6	0	31	0.00%	344.44%	9	0.26%
Delran Township Council 1st Ward (Vote For 1)	416	413	3	0	0	3	0.00%	5.88%	51	3.20%
Delran Township Council 2nd Ward (Vote For 1)	511	507	0	4	0	4	0.00%	0.32%	1,268	96.06%
Delran Township Council 3rd Ward (Vote For 1)	566	557	0	9	0	9	0.00%	0.77%	1,164	95.10%
Local BOE-Delran Twp (Vote For 3)	1,493	1,467	1	24	1	26	0.00%	0.81%	3,204	31.90%
Eastampton Township Council (Vote For 2)	639	632	0	6	1	7	0.00%	0.44%	1,601	48.08%
Eastampton Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)	639	620	0	19	0	19	0.00%	73.08%	26	1.51%
Local BOE-Eastampton Twp (Vote For 2)	639	604	0	35	0	35	0.00%	63.64%	55	3.23%
Edgewater Park Township Committee (Vote For 1)	741	740	1	0	0	1	0.00%	0.11%	870	36.90%
Local BOE-Edgewater Park Twp (Vote For 3)	741	719	1	21	0	22	0.00%	68.75%	32	1.14%
Local BOE-Edgewater Park Twp 2 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	741	725	0	16	0	16	0.00%	57.14%	28	100.00%
Mayor of Evesham Township (Vote For 1)	7,089	7,084	2	1	2	5	0.00%	0.28%	1,795	9.29%
Evesham Township Council (Vote For 2)	7,089	7,080	7	1	1	9	0.00%	0.64%	1,407	3.69%
Evesham Twp Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)	7,089	7,033	3	50	3	56	0.00%	0.46%	12,110	49.19%
Lenape Regional BOE-Evesham Twp (Vote For 1)	7,089	7,036	0	52	1	53	0.00%	0.39%	13,563	98.82%
Local BOE-Evesham Twp (Vote For 3)	7,089	6,804	186	99	0	285	0.00%	53.17%	536	1.42%
Fieldsboro Borough Council (Vote For 2)	28	28	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	46	12.89%
Fieldsboro Borough Council Unex (Vote For 1)	28	28	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	51	25.37%
Local BOE-Florence Twp (Vote For 3)	1,103	1,060	0	43	0	43	0.00%	39.81%	108	2.02%
Local BOE-Florence Twp 2 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	1,103	1,091	0	11	1	12	0.00%	0.40%	3,023	98.76%
Hainesport Township Committee (Vote For 2)	808	806	1	1	0	2	0.00%	12.50%	16	0.30%
Rancocas Valley Regional BOE-Hainesport Twp (Vote For 1)	808	802	0	5	1	6	0.00%	0.33%	1,832	98.07%
Local BOE-Hainesport Twp (Vote For 3)	808	803	0	5	0	5	0.00%	0.30%	1,666	31.82%
Lumberton Township Committee (Vote For 1)	1,382	1,381	1	0	0	1	0.00%	0.14%	725	16.06%
Rancocas Valley Regional BOE-Lumberton Twp (Vote For 1)	1,382	1,220	153	7	2	162	0.00%	66.12%	245	7.12%
Local BOE-Lumberton Twp (Vote For 3)	1,382	1,326	1	55	0	56	0.00%	40.88%	137	2.64%
Mansfield Township Committee (Vote For 1)	1,181	1,156	0	25	0	25	0.00%	1.08%	2,319	94.77%
N. Burlington Regional BOE-Mansfield Twp (Vote For 1)	1,181	1,130	0	49	2	51	0.00%	2.32%	2,196	88.19%
Local BOE-Mansfield Twp (Vote For 3)	1,181	1,167	0	14	0	14	0.00%	32.56%	43	1.00%
Local BOE-Mansfield Twp 2 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	1,181	1,175	0	5	1	6	0.00%	0.26%	2,323	98.81%
Local BOE-Mansfield Twp 1 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	1,181	1,164	0	17	0	17	0.00%	41.46%	41	100.00%
Maple Shade Township Council (Vote For 2)	1,128	1,121	4	3	0	7	0.00%	1.15%	610	6.51%
Local BOE-Mapleshade Twp (Vote For 3)	1,128	1,104	0	24	0	24	0.00%	0.85%	2,817	31.66%
Local BOE-Medford Lakes Boro (Vote For 1)	484	426	52	4	2	58	0.00%	9.42%	616	39.14%
Lenape Regional BOE-Medford Twp (Vote For 1)	4,389	4,350	0	37	2	39	0.00%	0.57%	6,788	97.67%
Local BOE-Medford Twp (Vote For 3)	4,389	4,287	78	24	0	102	0.00%	3400.00%	3	0.01%
Moorestown Township Council (Vote For 2)	3,519	3,508	6	4	1	11	0.00%	1.13%	977	4.87%
Local BOE-Moorestown Twp (Vote For 3)	3,519	3,411	75	31	2	108	0.00%	180.00%	60	0.28%
Local BOE-Moorestown Twp 1YR UNEX (Vote For 1)	3,519	3,477	0	40	2	42	0.00%	0.77%	5,468	97.85%
Mount Holly Township Council (Vote For 2)	777	767	0	9	1	10	0.00%	0.54%	1,851	47.82%
Mount Holly Twp Fire Commissioners (Vote For 1)	777	745	0	30	2	32	0.00%	1.88%	1,699	94.02%
Local BOE-Mount Holly Twp (Vote For 2)	777	763	0	13	1	14	0.00%	1.00%	1,407	43.43%
Mount Laurel Township Council (Vote For 2)	7,283	7,267	13	1	2	16	0.00%	0.47%	3,371	9.68%
Mount Laurel Twp Fire Commissioners (Vote For 1)	7,283	7,238	0	41	4	45	0.00%	0.35%	13,031	99.21%
Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp (Vote For 3)	7,283	6,872	341	69	1	411	0.00%	708.62%	58	0.17%
Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp UNEX (Vote For 1)	7,283	6,954	305	17	7	329	0.00%	88.20%	373	3.32%
New Hanover Township Committee (Vote For 1)	69	63	0	6	0	6	0.00%	6.38%	94	31.54%
Local BOE-New Hanover Township/Wrightstown (Vote For 2)	85	82	0	3	0	3	0.00%	1.18%	254	47.39%
Local BOE-New Hanover/Wrightstown 2 Yr Unexp (Vote For 1)	85	81	0	4	0	4	0.00%	28.57%	14	100.00%
North Hanover Township Committee (Vote For 2)	386	381	0	5	0	5	0.00%	0.40%	1,243	48.99%
N. Burlington Regional BOE-North Hanover Twp (Vote For 2)	386	361	22	3	0	25	0.00%	10.68%	234	11.11%
Local BOE-North Hanover Twp (Vote For 2)	386	376	0	9	1	10	0.00%	1.21%	826	43.66%
Palmyra Borough Council (Vote For 2)	504	503	1	0	0	1	0.00%	0.17%	603	12.12%
Local BOE-Palmyra Boro (Vote For 3)	504	455	45	4	0	49	0.00%	15.22%	322	6.57%
Pemberton Borough Council (Vote For 2)	109	109	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	47	6.34%
Mayor of Pemberton Township (Vote For 1)	1,853	1,843	1	9	0	10	0.00%	2.30%	435	6.76%
Pemberton Township Council (Vote For 2)	1,853	1,848	4	1	0	5	0.00%	5.68%	88	0.69%
Local BOE-Pemberton Twp/Pem Boro (Vote For 3)	1,962	1,803	132	27	0	159	0.00%	244.62%	65	0.53%
Riverside Township Committee (Vote For 1)	427	424	3	0	0	3	0.00%	1.35%	223	12.75%
Local BOE-Riverside Twp (Vote For 3)	427	398	25	4	0	29	0.00%	19.86%	146	4.54%
Riverton Borough Council (Vote For 2)	314	300	1	13	0	14	0.00%	25.00%	56	2.65%
Local BOE-Riverton Boro (Vote For 3)	314	278	15	21	0	36	0.00%	11.69%	308	11.43%
Shamong Township Committee (Vote For 2)	657	633	0	24	0	24	0.00%	1.27%	1,888	47.93%
Local BOE-Shamong Twp (Vote For 2)	657	638	0	19	0	19	0.00%	1.32%	1,437	45.94%
Southampton Township Committee (Vote For 2)	1,440	1,417	0	23	0	23	0.00%	0.71%	3,234	47.94%
Local BOE-Southampton Twp (Vote For 3)	1,440	1,356	61	22	1	84	0.00%	1200.00%	7	0.07%
Springfield Township Council (Vote For 3)	297	287	0	10	0	10	0.00%	1.02%	977	31.30%
Local BOE-Springfield Twp (Vote For 3)	297	296	0	1	0	1	0.00%	0.13%	763	30.00%
Local BOE-Springfield Twp 2 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	297	296	0	1	0	1	0.00%	0.11%	917	99.35%
Local BOE-Springfield Twp 1 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	297	295	0	2	0	2	0.00%	0.22%	928	98.51%
Tabernacle Township Committee (Vote For 2)	771	758	0	12	1	13	0.00%	0.57%	2,272	48.68%
Tabernacle Township Committee 2Yr Unex (Vote For 1)	771	759	0	11	1	12	0.00%	0.52%	2,325	98.48%
Lenape Regional BOE-Tabernacle (Vote For 1)	771	764	0	6	1	7	0.00%	0.34%	2,045	98.74%
Local BOE-Tabernacle Twp (Vote For 3)	771	738	27	5	1	33	0.00%	42.31%	78	1.20%
Washington Township Committee (Vote For 1)	60	58	0	2	0	2	0.00%	1.22%	164	87.23%
Local BOE-Washington Twp (Vote For 1)	60	53	0	7	0	7	0.00%	77.78%	9	100.00%
Westampton Township Committee (Vote For 1)	895	895	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	1,067	32.41%
Westampton Township Committee- 2 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	895	894	0	0	1	1	0.00%	0.10%	1,014	30.81%
Local BOE-Westampton Twp (Vote For 3)	895	882	0	13	0	13	0.00%	0.69%	1,887	31.49%
Local BOE-Westampton Twp 1 Yr Unexpired (Vote For 1)	895	870	0	25	0	25	0.00%	39.68%	63	100.00%
Local BOE - Willingboro Twp. (Vote For 3)	3,748	3,680	4	62	2	68	0.00%	1.17%	5,835	31.14%
Woodland Township Committee (Vote For 1)	96	91	0	5	0	5	0.00%	1.39%	361	94.26%
Lenape Regional BOE-Woodland Twp (Vote For 1)	96	92	0	3	1	4	0.00%	1.29%	309	95.67%
Local BOE-Woodland Twp (Vote For 1)	96	82	0	14	0	14	0.00%	70.00%	20	100.00%
Mayor of Wrightstown Borough (Vote For 1)	16	15	0	1	0	1	0.00%	1.49%	67	87.01%
Wrightstown Borough Council (Vote For 2)	16	15	0	1	0	1	0.00%	1.43%	70	48.28%
Wrightstown Borough Council 2 Yr Unex (Vote For 1)	16	16	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	71	94.67%
Beverly City Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)	159	151	1	5	2	8	0.00%	2.11%	379	47.91%
Bordentown Twp FD1 Commissioners (Vote For 2)	369	367	0	2	0	2	0.00%	14.29%	14	1.33%
Bordentown Twp FD2 Commissioners (Vote For 2)	760	749	1	10	0	11	0.00%	0.66%	1,659	49.40%
Cinnaminson Twp Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)	1,776	1,753	5	18	0	23	0.00%	0.51%	4,520	48.57%
Riverside Fire Comm (Vote For 1)	427	406	0	21	0	21	0.00%	52.50%	40	100.00%
Bordentown Twp Municipal Public Question (Vote For 1)	1,129	1,128	0	0	1	1	0.00%	0.15%	675	18.09%
Delanco Local School District Question (Vote For 1)	109	109	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	434	24.97%
Delran Local School Bond Proposal #1 (Vote For 1)	1,493	1,490	0	0	3	3	0.00%	0.24%	1,250	23.77%
Delran Local School Bond Proposal #2 (Vote For 1)	1,917	1,916	0	0	1	1	0.00%	0.09%	1,136	21.85%
Edgewater Park Municipal Public Question (Vote For 1)	741	741	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	85	3.98%
Lumberton Municipal Public Question (Vote For 1)	1,382	1,382	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	481	11.73%
Tabernacle Local School District Question (Vote For 1)	771	770	0	0	1	1	0.00%	0.21%	467	16.55%
Total:	329,874	325,848	2,259	1,660	107	4,026	0.00%	1.66%	243,089

Contest 'U.S. House of Representatives: District 1 (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: U.S. House of Representatives: District 1 (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	0
overvotes	0	16	-16
undervotes	0	13	-13
num_ballots	7,374	1,632	5,742
tot_votes	7,279	1,603	5,676
writeins	3	1	2
gray_eval	0
margin	1,681	970
winners	['DEM - Donald W. NORCROSS']	['DEM - Donald W. NORCROSS']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Donald W. NORCROSS	4,406	1,273	3,133	60.5%
REP - Claire GUSTAFSON	2,725	303	2,422	37.4%
NP - Patricia KLINE	63	12	51	0.87%
NP - Allen J. CANNON	42	7	35	0.58%
NP - Isaiah FLETCHER	40	7	33	0.55%
writeins	3	1	2

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[U.S. House of Representatives: Distric..-representatives-district-1-vote-for-1)	1,632	1,615	16	1	0	0	0	17	0.00%	1.01%	1,681	23.09%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	1

Contest 'U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	1
overvotes	0	366	-366
undervotes	0	198	-198
num_ballots	159,693	50,160	109,533
tot_votes	158,617	49,596	109,021
writeins	54	19	35
gray_eval	0
margin	28,614	25,386
winners	['DEM - Andy KIM']	['DEM - Andy KIM']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Andy KIM	92,925	37,324	55,601	58.6%
REP - Bob HEALEY	64,311	11,938	52,373	40.5%
NP - Gregory M. SOBOCINSKI	708	154	554	0.45%
NP - Christopher RUSSOMANNO	619	161	458	0.39%
writeins	54	19	35

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[U.S. House of Representatives: Distric..-representatives-district-3-vote-for-1)	50,160	49,767	360	19	0	14	0	393	0.00%	1.37%	28,614	18.04%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	19
x_x_gry	8

Contest 'General Assembly 12th Legislative District UNEX (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: General Assembly 12th Legislative District UNEX (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	2
overvotes	0	1	-1
undervotes	0	78	-78
num_ballots	4,718	1,492	3,226
tot_votes	4,513	1,413	3,100
writeins	1	0	1
gray_eval	0
margin	586	381
winners	['REP - Alexander SAUICKIE III']	['DEM - Paul SARTI']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
REP - Alexander SAUICKIE III	2,549	516	2,033	56.5%
DEM - Paul SARTI	1,963	897	1,066	43.5%
writeins	1		1

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[General Assembly 12th Legislative Dist..h-legislative-district-unex-vote-for-1)	1,492	1,491	1	0	0	0	0	1	0.00%	0.17%	586	12.98%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Sheriff (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Sheriff (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	3
overvotes	0	32	-32
undervotes	0	1,987	-1987
num_ballots	167,067	51,792	115,275
tot_votes	161,068	49,773	111,295
writeins	76	31	45
gray_eval	0
margin	19,588	22,628
winners	['DEM - James H. KOSTOPLIS']	['DEM - James H. KOSTOPLIS']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - James H. KOSTOPLIS	90,290	36,185	54,105	56.1%
REP - Mike DITZEL	70,702	13,557	57,145	43.9%
writeins	76	31	45

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Sheriff (Vote For 1)	51,792	51,723	29	30	0	10	0	69	0.00%	0.35%	19,588	12.16%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	31
x_x_gry	6

Contest 'County Commissioners (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: County Commissioners (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	4
overvotes	0	37	-37
undervotes	0	2,000	-2000
num_ballots	167,067	51,792	115,275
tot_votes	160,721	49,755	110,966
writeins	48	22	26
gray_eval	0
margin	21,513	23,411
winners	['DEM - Allison ECKEL']	['DEM - Allison ECKEL']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Allison ECKEL	91,093	36,572	54,521	56.7%
REP - Jeff FORTUNE	69,580	13,161	56,419	43.3%
writeins	48	22	26

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
County Commissioners (Vote For 1)	51,792	51,726	32	21	0	13	0	66	0.00%	0.31%	21,513	13.39%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	22
x_x_gry	7

Contest 'Local BOE- Bass River (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE- Bass River (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	5
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	53	-53
num_ballots	520	57	463
tot_votes	51	4	47
writeins	9	4	5
gray_eval	0
margin	9	4
winners	['writeins']	['writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
writeins	9	4	5

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE- Bass River (Vote For 1)	57	53	0	4	0	0	0	4	0.00%	44.44%	9	100.00%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	4

Contest 'Local BOE-Beverly City (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Beverly City (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	6
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	287	-287
num_ballots	637	159	478
tot_votes	126	31	95
writeins	44	31	13
gray_eval	0
margin	44	0
winners	['writeins']	['writeins', 'NP - Cynthia Hall Miller']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
writeins	44	31	13

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Beverly City (Vote For 2)	159	139	0	20	0	0	0	20	0.00%	45.45%	44	100.00%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	20

Contest 'Bordentown Township Committee (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Bordentown Township Committee (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	7
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	257	-257
num_ballots	4,275	1,129	3,146
tot_votes	2,790	872	1,918
writeins	43	6	37
gray_eval	0
margin	2,704	860
winners	['DEM - Eugene M. FUZY']	['DEM - Eugene M. FUZY']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Eugene M. FUZY	2,747	866	1,881	98.5%
writeins	43	6	37

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Bordentown Township Committee (Vote Fo..rdentown-township-committee-vote-for-1)	1,129	1,123	0	6	0	0	0	6	0.00%	0.22%	2,704	96.92%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	6

Contest 'Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	8
overvotes	0	46	-46
undervotes	0	1,025	-1025
num_ballots	4,275	1,129	3,146
tot_votes	8,053	2,224	5,829
writeins	29	9	20
gray_eval	0
margin	102	76
winners	['NP - Laura PAPP', 'NP - Stephen P. HEBERLING', 'NP - Larry BRAASCH']	['NP - Laura PAPP', 'NP - Stephen P. HEBERLING', 'NP - Larry BRAASCH']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Laura PAPP	2,356	619	1,737	29.3%
NP - Stephen P. HEBERLING	1,801	444	1,357	22.4%
NP - Larry BRAASCH	1,419	437	982	17.6%
NP - Richard SHENOWSKI	1,317	361	956	16.4%
NP - Joann HOLMAN	1,131	354	777	14.0%
writeins	29	9	20

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp..regional-boe-bordentown-twp-vote-for-3)	1,129	1,077	44	6	0	2	0	52	0.00%	50.98%	102	1.27%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	6

Contest 'Burlington City Council Ward 3 Unex (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Burlington City Council Ward 3 Unex (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	9
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	44	-44
num_ballots	745	181	564
tot_votes	511	137	374
writeins	6	3	3
gray_eval	0
margin	499	131
winners	['DEM - Dawn BERGNER-THOMPSON']	['DEM - Dawn BERGNER-THOMPSON']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Dawn BERGNER-THOMPSON	505	134	371	98.8%
writeins	6	3	3

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Burlington City Council Ward 3 Unex (V..on-city-council-ward-3-unex-vote-for-1)	181	178	0	2	0	1	0	3	0.00%	0.60%	499	97.65%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	3

Contest 'Burlington City Bd of Island Mngrs-Manager (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Burlington City Bd of Island Mngrs-Manager (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	10
overvotes	0	34	-34
undervotes	0	544	-544
num_ballots	2,778	687	2,091
tot_votes	5,094	1,415	3,679
writeins	16	5	11
gray_eval	0
margin	85	11
winners	['NP - James McCREARY', 'NP - Michael E. ZALOT', 'NP - Jamie ZALOT']	['NP - James McCREARY', 'NP - Michael E. ZALOT', 'NP - Jamie ZALOT']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - James McCREARY	1,139	288	851	22.4%
NP - Michael E. ZALOT	1,039	283	756	20.4%
NP - Jamie ZALOT	902	255	647	17.7%
NP - Shenee OMUSO	817	244	573	16.0%
NP - Michael F. MUENCH	609	177	432	12.0%
NP - Charles R. JOHNSTON	572	163	409	11.2%
writeins	16	5	11

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Burlington City Bd of Island Mngrs-Man..-bd-of-island-mngrs-manager-vote-for-3)	687	649	34	4	0	0	0	38	0.00%	44.71%	85	1.67%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	4

Contest 'Chesterfield Township Committee (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Chesterfield Township Committee (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	18
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	60	-60
num_ballots	2,505	1,021	1,484
tot_votes	4,881	1,982	2,899
writeins	3	2	1
gray_eval	0
margin	52	298
winners	['DEM - Matthew LITT', 'DEM - Shreekant DHOPTE']	['DEM - Shreekant DHOPTE', 'DEM - Matthew LITT']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Matthew LITT	1,249	643	606	25.6%
DEM - Shreekant DHOPTE	1,249	649	600	25.6%
REP - Lido PANFILI	1,197	345	852	24.5%
REP - Michael J. RUSSO	1,183	343	840	24.2%
writeins	3	2	1

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Chesterfield Township Committee (Vote ..terfield-township-committee-vote-for-2)	1,021	1,019	0	2	0	0	0	2	0.00%	3.85%	52	1.07%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	2

Contest 'Local BOE-Cinnaminson Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Cinnaminson Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	23
overvotes	0	91	-91
undervotes	0	1,361	-1361
num_ballots	6,823	1,776	5,047
tot_votes	14,612	3,694	10,918
writeins	53	36	17
gray_eval	0
margin	95	211
winners	['NP - Michael BRAMHALL', 'NP - Christine L. TURNER', 'NP - Katherine BLEISTINE']	['NP - Christine L. TURNER', 'NP - Michael BRAMHALL', 'NP - Christine TRAMPE']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Michael BRAMHALL	3,492	887	2,605	23.9%
NP - Christine L. TURNER	3,067	893	2,174	21.0%
NP - Katherine BLEISTINE	2,808	568	2,240	19.2%
NP - Christine TRAMPE	2,713	779	1,934	18.6%
NP - Eileen BLEISTINE	2,479	531	1,948	17.0%
writeins	53	36	17

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Cinnaminson Twp (Vote For 3)..t-local-boe-cinnaminson-twp-vote-for-3)	1,776	1,658	90	27	0	1	0	118	0.00%	124.21%	95	0.65%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	27

Contest 'Local BOE-Delanco Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Delanco Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	25
overvotes	0	25	-25
undervotes	0	607	-607
num_ballots	1,988	533	1,455
tot_votes	3,526	917	2,609
writeins	14	9	5
gray_eval	0
margin	9	9
winners	['NP - Ryan VARGA', 'NP - David McNICHOLS', 'NP - Vera DARMO']	['NP - Ryan VARGA', 'NP - Vera DARMO', 'NP - David McNICHOLS']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Ryan VARGA	983	244	739	27.9%
NP - David McNICHOLS	948	221	727	26.9%
NP - Vera DARMO	795	231	564	22.5%
NP - Samuel JAMES	786	212	574	22.3%
writeins	14	9	5

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Delanco Twp (Vote For 3)	533	502	25	6	0	0	0	31	0.00%	344.44%	9	0.26%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	6

Contest 'Delran Township Council 1st Ward (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Delran Township Council 1st Ward (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	26
overvotes	0	3	-3
undervotes	0	26	-26
num_ballots	1,669	416	1,253
tot_votes	1,592	387	1,205
writeins	1	0	1
gray_eval	0
margin	51	165
winners	['DEM - Nikki ROBERTS-APEADU']	['DEM - Nikki ROBERTS-APEADU']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Nikki ROBERTS-APEADU	821	276	545	51.6%
REP - Charles "Bob" GILBERT	770	111	659	48.4%
writeins	1		1

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Delran Township Council 1st Ward (Vote..n-township-council-1st-ward-vote-for-1)	416	413	3	0	0	0	0	3	0.00%	5.88%	51	3.20%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Eastampton Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Eastampton Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	31
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	786	-786
num_ballots	2,514	639	1,875
tot_votes	1,750	492	1,258
writeins	26	21	5
gray_eval	0
margin	26	21
winners	['NP - John A. ADAMS', 'writeins']	['NP - John A. ADAMS', 'writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - John A. ADAMS	1,695	471	1,224	96.9%
writeins	26	21	5

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Eastampton Fire Commissioners (Vote Fo..stampton-fire-commissioners-vote-for-2)	639	620	0	19	0	0	0	19	0.00%	73.08%	26	1.51%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	19

Contest 'Local BOE-Eastampton Twp (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Eastampton Twp (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	32
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	775	-775
num_ballots	2,514	639	1,875
tot_votes	1,765	503	1,262
writeins	55	38	17
gray_eval	0
margin	55	38
winners	['NP - Kerry DOUGLAS', 'writeins']	['NP - Kerry DOUGLAS', 'writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Kerry DOUGLAS	1,648	465	1,183	93.4%
writeins	55	38	17

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Eastampton Twp (Vote For 2)]..st-local-boe-eastampton-twp-vote-for-2)	639	604	0	35	0	0	0	35	0.00%	63.64%	55	3.23%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	35

Contest 'Local BOE-Edgewater Park Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Edgewater Park Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	34
overvotes	0	1	-1
undervotes	0	1,238	-1238
num_ballots	2,463	741	1,722
tot_votes	2,824	982	1,842
writeins	32	30	2
gray_eval	0
margin	32	30
winners	['NP - Colleen TORRES', 'NP - Jeffry DALOISIO', 'writeins']	['NP - Colleen TORRES', 'NP - Jeffry DALOISIO', 'writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Colleen TORRES	1,476	502	974	52.3%
NP - Jeffry DALOISIO	1,305	450	855	46.2%
writeins	32	30	2

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Edgewater Park Twp (Vote For..ocal-boe-edgewater-park-twp-vote-for-3)	741	719	1	21	0	0	0	22	0.00%	68.75%	32	1.14%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	21

Contest 'Mayor of Evesham Township (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Mayor of Evesham Township (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	36
overvotes	0	3	-3
undervotes	0	131	-131
num_ballots	19,656	7,089	12,567
tot_votes	19,316	6,955	12,361
writeins	5	1	4
gray_eval	0
margin	1,795	2,956
winners	['DEM - Jaclyn VEASY']	['DEM - Jaclyn VEASY']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Jaclyn VEASY	10,553	4,955	5,598	54.6%
REP - Dennis MEHIGAN	8,758	1,999	6,759	45.3%
writeins	5	1	4

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Mayor of Evesham Township (Vote For 1)..t-mayor-of-evesham-township-vote-for-1)	7,089	7,084	2	1	0	2	0	5	0.00%	0.28%	1,795	9.29%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	1
x_x_gry	1

Contest 'Evesham Township Council (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Evesham Township Council (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	37
overvotes	0	7	-7
undervotes	0	365	-365
num_ballots	19,656	7,089	12,567
tot_votes	38,170	13,799	24,371
writeins	6	2	4
gray_eval	0
margin	1,407	2,810
winners	['DEM - Heather COOPER', 'DEM - Patricia HANSEN']	['DEM - Heather COOPER', 'DEM - Patricia HANSEN']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Heather COOPER	10,328	4,905	5,423	27.1%
DEM - Patricia HANSEN	10,217	4,848	5,369	26.8%
REP - Bonnie OLT	8,810	2,006	6,804	23.1%
REP - Michael THOMPSON	8,809	2,038	6,771	23.1%
writeins	6	2	4

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Evesham Township Council (Vote For 2)]..st-evesham-township-council-vote-for-2)	7,089	7,080	7	1	0	1	0	9	0.00%	0.64%	1,407	3.69%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	1
x_x_gry	1

Contest 'Local BOE-Evesham Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Evesham Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	40
overvotes	0	186	-186
undervotes	0	6,613	-6613
num_ballots	19,656	7,089	12,567
tot_votes	37,736	14,096	23,640
writeins	223	125	98
gray_eval	0
margin	536	67
winners	['NP - Tracy FOX', 'NP - David BOCK', 'NP - William THOMPSON']	['NP - Tracy FOX', 'NP - David BOCK', 'NP - Eric SPERRAZZA']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Tracy FOX	8,138	3,276	4,862	21.6%
NP - David BOCK	7,963	3,094	4,869	21.1%
NP - William THOMPSON	7,520	2,458	5,062	19.9%
NP - Dorian CARLETON	6,984	2,538	4,446	18.5%
NP - Eric SPERRAZZA	6,908	2,605	4,303	18.3%
writeins	223	125	98

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Evesham Twp (Vote For 3)	7,089	6,804	186	99	0	0	0	285	0.00%	53.17%	536	1.42%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	99

Contest 'Local BOE-Florence Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Florence Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	43
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	1,853	-1853
num_ballots	4,501	1,103	3,398
tot_votes	5,372	1,456	3,916
writeins	108	55	53
gray_eval	0
margin	108	55
winners	['NP - Toby Lynn ECHGELMEIER POPSO', 'NP - Anthony J. NUTTER', 'writeins']	['NP - Anthony J. NUTTER', 'NP - Toby Lynn ECHGELMEIER POPSO', 'writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Toby Lynn ECHGELMEIER POPSO	2,697	698	1,999	50.2%
NP - Anthony J. NUTTER	2,554	703	1,851	47.5%
writeins	108	55	53

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Florence Twp (Vote For 3)	1,103	1,060	0	43	0	0	0	43	0.00%	39.81%	108	2.02%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	43

Contest 'Hainesport Township Committee (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Hainesport Township Committee (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	45
overvotes	0	1	-1
undervotes	0	38	-38
num_ballots	2,765	808	1,957
tot_votes	5,377	1,576	3,801
writeins	3	1	2
gray_eval	0
margin	16	242
winners	['REP - Leila GILMORE', 'DEM - Anna M. EVANS']	['DEM - Anna M. EVANS', 'DEM - Debra L. HARRIS']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
REP - Leila GILMORE	1,366	276	1,090	25.4%
DEM - Anna M. EVANS	1,354	524	830	25.2%
DEM - Debra L. HARRIS	1,338	518	820	24.9%
REP - Bruce MacLACHLAN	1,316	257	1,059	24.5%
writeins	3	1	2

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Hainesport Township Committee (Vote Fo..inesport-township-committee-vote-for-2)	808	806	1	1	0	0	0	2	0.00%	12.50%	16	0.30%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	1

Contest 'Rancocas Valley Regional BOE-Lumberton Twp (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Rancocas Valley Regional BOE-Lumberton Twp (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	49
overvotes	0	154	-154
undervotes	0	321	-321
num_ballots	4,670	1,382	3,288
tot_votes	3,443	907	2,536
writeins	22	7	15
gray_eval	0
margin	245	134
winners	['NP - Randy BROLO']	['NP - Randy BROLO']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Randy BROLO	1,833	517	1,316	53.2%
NP - Robert L. SAPP	1,588	383	1,205	46.1%
writeins	22	7	15

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Rancocas Valley Regional BOE-Lumberton..-regional-boe-lumberton-twp-vote-for-1)	1,382	1,220	153	7	0	2	0	162	0.00%	66.12%	245	7.12%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	7
x_x_gry	1

Contest 'Local BOE-Lumberton Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Lumberton Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	50
overvotes	0	1	-1
undervotes	0	2,445	-2445
num_ballots	4,670	1,382	3,288
tot_votes	5,268	1,698	3,570
writeins	137	68	69
gray_eval	0
margin	137	68
winners	['NP - Martha "Marcy" SMITH', 'NP - Christopher TOMMINS', 'writeins']	['NP - Martha "Marcy" SMITH', 'NP - Christopher TOMMINS', 'writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Martha "Marcy" SMITH	2,734	877	1,857	51.9%
NP - Christopher TOMMINS	2,321	753	1,568	44.1%
writeins	137	68	69

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Lumberton Twp (Vote For 3)	1,382	1,326	1	55	0	0	0	56	0.00%	40.88%	137	2.64%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	55

Contest 'Local BOE-Mansfield Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Mansfield Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	53
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	2,243	-2243
num_ballots	4,105	1,181	2,924
tot_votes	4,310	1,300	3,010
writeins	43	22	21
gray_eval	0
margin	43	22
winners	['NP - Abbey T. HARRIS', 'NP - Stephen THOMAS', 'writeins']	['NP - Abbey T. HARRIS', 'NP - Stephen THOMAS', 'writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Abbey T. HARRIS	2,240	669	1,571	52.0%
NP - Stephen THOMAS	1,999	609	1,390	46.4%
writeins	43	22	21

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Mansfield Twp (Vote For 3)	1,181	1,167	0	14	0	0	0	14	0.00%	32.56%	43	1.00%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	14

Contest 'Maple Shade Township Council (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Maple Shade Township Council (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	56
overvotes	0	4	-4
undervotes	0	58	-58
num_ballots	4,822	1,128	3,694
tot_votes	9,367	2,190	7,177
writeins	11	3	8
gray_eval	0
margin	610	604
winners	['DEM - Sandra NUNES', 'DEM - Charles KAUFFMAN']	['DEM - Sandra NUNES', 'DEM - Charles KAUFFMAN']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Sandra NUNES	2,659	857	1,802	28.4%
DEM - Charles KAUFFMAN	2,643	847	1,796	28.2%
REP - Anthony P. VENERI	2,033	243	1,790	21.7%
REP - David C. MOY	2,021	240	1,781	21.6%
writeins	11	3	8

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Maple Shade Township Council (Vote For..aple-shade-township-council-vote-for-2)	1,128	1,121	4	3	0	0	0	7	0.00%	1.15%	610	6.51%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	3

Contest 'Local BOE-Medford Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Medford Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	60
overvotes	0	78	-78
undervotes	0	4,002	-4002
num_ballots	11,177	4,389	6,788
tot_votes	22,694	8,931	13,763
writeins	50	38	12
gray_eval	0
margin	3	51
winners	['NP - Michael W. ETTER', 'NP - Kristen M. SINCLAIR', 'NP - Lauren CAFFERY']	['NP - Michael W. ETTER', 'NP - Cara BROOKS', 'NP - Leslie HURFF']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Michael W. ETTER	3,522	1,312	2,210	15.5%
NP - Kristen M. SINCLAIR	2,908	868	2,040	12.8%
NP - Lauren CAFFERY	2,781	878	1,903	12.3%
NP - Cara BROOKS	2,778	1,279	1,499	12.2%
NP - Michael A. CZYZYK	2,276	701	1,575	10.0%
NP - Michael PANARELLA	1,998	886	1,112	8.8%
NP - Leslie HURFF	1,859	937	922	8.2%
NP - Pamela SCHELLER	1,761	799	962	7.8%
NP - Bruno BERENATO	1,600	674	926	7.1%
NP - Kenyette JONES	1,161	559	602	5.1%
writeins	50	38	12

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Medford Twp (Vote For 3)	4,389	4,287	78	24	0	0	0	102	0.00%	3400.00%	3	0.01%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	24

Contest 'Moorestown Township Council (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Moorestown Township Council (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	61
overvotes	0	6	-6
undervotes	0	108	-108
num_ballots	10,231	3,519	6,712
tot_votes	20,064	6,918	13,146
writeins	7	4	3
gray_eval	0
margin	977	1,475
winners	['DEM - Nicole GILLESPIE', 'DEM - Quinton LAW']	['DEM - Nicole GILLESPIE', 'DEM - Quinton LAW']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Nicole GILLESPIE	5,597	2,479	3,118	27.9%
DEM - Quinton LAW	5,536	2,477	3,059	27.6%
REP - Janice CACCURO	4,559	1,002	3,557	22.7%
REP - Tara BANASZ	4,365	956	3,409	21.8%
writeins	7	4	3

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Moorestown Township Council (Vote For ..moorestown-township-council-vote-for-2)	3,519	3,508	6	4	0	1	0	11	0.00%	1.13%	977	4.87%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	4
x_x_gry	1

Contest 'Local BOE-Moorestown Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Moorestown Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	62
overvotes	0	77	-77
undervotes	0	2,883	-2883
num_ballots	10,231	3,519	6,712
tot_votes	21,718	7,443	14,275
writeins	51	38	13
gray_eval	0
margin	60	56
winners	['NP - Mark VILLANUEVA', 'NP - Claudine MORANO', 'NP - Danielle MILLER']	['NP - Billie D. THOMAS', 'NP - Mark SNYDER', 'NP - Claudine MORANO']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Mark VILLANUEVA	4,538	1,354	3,184	20.9%
NP - Claudine MORANO	4,510	1,410	3,100	20.8%
NP - Danielle MILLER	4,275	1,252	3,023	19.7%
NP - Billie D. THOMAS	4,215	1,729	2,486	19.4%
NP - Mark SNYDER	4,129	1,660	2,469	19.0%
writeins	51	38	13

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Moorestown Twp (Vote For 3)]..st-local-boe-moorestown-twp-vote-for-3)	3,519	3,411	75	31	0	2	0	108	0.00%	180.00%	60	0.28%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	31

Contest 'Mount Laurel Township Council (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Mount Laurel Township Council (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	67
overvotes	0	15	-15
undervotes	0	487	-487
num_ballots	18,120	7,283	10,837
tot_votes	34,839	14,049	20,790
writeins	5	2	3
gray_eval	0
margin	3,371	3,434
winners	['DEM - Stephen J. STEGLIK', 'DEM - Kareem A. PRITCHETT Sr.']	['DEM - Stephen J. STEGLIK', 'DEM - Kareem A. PRITCHETT Sr.']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
DEM - Stephen J. STEGLIK	10,435	5,236	5,199	30.0%
DEM - Kareem A. PRITCHETT Sr.	10,421	5,227	5,194	29.9%
REP - Bob REILLO	7,050	1,793	5,257	20.2%
REP - Andy GAUS	6,928	1,791	5,137	19.9%
writeins	5	2	3

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Mount Laurel Township Council (Vote Fo..unt-laurel-township-council-vote-for-2)	7,283	7,267	13	1	0	2	0	16	0.00%	0.47%	3,371	9.68%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	1

Contest 'Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	69
overvotes	0	342	-342
undervotes	0	7,051	-7051
num_ballots	18,120	7,283	10,837
tot_votes	34,142	13,772	20,370
writeins	155	89	66
gray_eval	0
margin	58	377
winners	['NP - Curtis GREEN', 'NP - Danielle A. STUFFO', 'NP - Roger E. GIBSON']	['NP - Curtis GREEN', 'NP - Danielle A. STUFFO', 'NP - Michael J. WRIGHT Jr.']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Curtis GREEN	7,194	2,905	4,289	21.1%
NP - Danielle A. STUFFO	6,275	2,810	3,465	18.4%
NP - Roger E. GIBSON	5,982	2,138	3,844	17.5%
NP - Michael J. WRIGHT Jr.	5,924	2,515	3,409	17.4%
NP - Navleen KHAROUDH	4,818	1,871	2,947	14.1%
NP - Anthony CORBI III	3,794	1,444	2,350	11.1%
writeins	155	89	66

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp (Vote For 3..-local-boe-mount-laurel-twp-vote-for-3)	7,283	6,872	341	69	0	1	0	411	0.00%	708.62%	58	0.17%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	69

Contest 'Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp UNEX (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp UNEX (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	70
overvotes	0	306	-306
undervotes	0	2,567	-2567
num_ballots	18,120	7,283	10,837
tot_votes	11,246	4,410	6,836
writeins	33	20	13
gray_eval	0
margin	373	206
winners	['NP - Jon PARADISE']	['NP - Jon PARADISE']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Jon PARADISE	5,793	2,298	3,495	51.5%
NP - Sapna RUSTAGI	5,420	2,092	3,328	48.2%
writeins	33	20	13

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Mount Laurel Twp UNEX (Vote ..l-boe-mount-laurel-twp-unex-vote-for-1)	7,283	6,954	305	17	0	7	0	329	0.00%	88.20%	373	3.32%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	20
x_x_gry	3

Contest 'Local BOE-Palmyra Boro (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Palmyra Boro (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	78
overvotes	0	45	-45
undervotes	0	432	-432
num_ballots	2,552	504	2,048
tot_votes	4,901	945	3,956
writeins	23	6	17
gray_eval	0
margin	322	21
winners	['NP - Cara BROADBELT', 'NP - Kate ALLEN-YOAKUM', 'NP - Erika S. CELLEY']	['NP - Cara BROADBELT', 'NP - Kate ALLEN-YOAKUM', 'NP - Erika S. CELLEY']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Cara BROADBELT	1,205	215	990	24.6%
NP - Kate ALLEN-YOAKUM	1,182	211	971	24.1%
NP - Erika S. CELLEY	1,059	199	860	21.6%
NP - Dana KERRIHARD	737	178	559	15.0%
NP - Mary SHIPTON	695	136	559	14.2%
writeins	23	6	17

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Palmyra Boro (Vote For 3)	504	455	45	4	0	0	0	49	0.00%	15.22%	322	6.57%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	4

Contest 'Pemberton Borough Council (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Pemberton Borough Council (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	79
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	49	-49
num_ballots	466	109	357
tot_votes	741	169	572
writeins	1	0	1
gray_eval	0
margin	47	34
winners	['REP - Diane FANUCCI', 'DEM - Steven FENSTER']	['DEM - Steven FENSTER', 'REP - Diane FANUCCI']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
REP - Diane FANUCCI	279	62	217	37.7%
DEM - Steven FENSTER	254	79	175	34.3%
REP - Stewart THOMPSON	207	28	179	27.9%
writeins	1		1

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Pemberton Borough Council (Vote For 2)..t-pemberton-borough-council-vote-for-2)	109	109	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	47	6.34%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Mayor of Pemberton Township (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Mayor of Pemberton Township (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	80
overvotes	0	1	-1
undervotes	0	65	-65
num_ballots	6,642	1,853	4,789
tot_votes	6,436	1,787	4,649
writeins	23	9	14
gray_eval	0
margin	435	466
winners	['REP - Jack K. TOMPKINS']	['DEM - David A. PATRIARCA']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
REP - Jack K. TOMPKINS	3,424	656	2,768	53.2%
DEM - David A. PATRIARCA	2,989	1,122	1,867	46.4%
writeins	23	9	14

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Mayor of Pemberton Township (Vote For ..mayor-of-pemberton-township-vote-for-1)	1,853	1,843	1	9	0	0	0	10	0.00%	2.30%	435	6.76%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	9

Contest 'Pemberton Township Council (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Pemberton Township Council (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	81
overvotes	0	4	-4
undervotes	0	148	-148
num_ballots	6,642	1,853	4,789
tot_votes	12,753	3,550	9,203
writeins	7	2	5
gray_eval	0
margin	88	577
winners	['REP - Daniel DEWEY Sr.', 'REP - Joshua WARD']	['DEM - Jason A. ALLEN', 'DEM - Gaye BURTON']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
REP - Daniel DEWEY Sr.	3,283	598	2,685	25.7%
REP - Joshua WARD	3,236	590	2,646	25.4%
DEM - Jason A. ALLEN	3,148	1,185	1,963	24.7%
DEM - Gaye BURTON	3,079	1,175	1,904	24.1%
writeins	7	2	5

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Pemberton Township Council (Vote For 2..-pemberton-township-council-vote-for-2)	1,853	1,848	4	1	0	0	0	5	0.00%	5.68%	88	0.69%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	1

Contest 'Local BOE-Pemberton Twp/Pem Boro (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Pemberton Twp/Pem Boro (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	82
overvotes	0	132	-132
undervotes	0	2,020	-2020
num_ballots	7,108	1,962	5,146
tot_votes	12,315	3,470	8,845
writeins	58	35	23
gray_eval	0
margin	65	12
winners	['NP - Vicky L. ADAMS', 'NP - Robert "Pete" E. KING', 'NP - Wanda KNOX']	['NP - Vicky L. ADAMS', 'NP - Wanda KNOX', 'NP - Lionel C. LEE']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Vicky L. ADAMS	2,872	838	2,034	23.3%
NP - Robert "Pete" E. KING	2,858	690	2,168	23.2%
NP - Wanda KNOX	2,221	721	1,500	18.0%
NP - Charles R. de CHARLEROY Jr.	2,156	484	1,672	17.5%
NP - Lionel C. LEE	2,150	702	1,448	17.5%
writeins	58	35	23

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Pemberton Twp/Pem Boro (Vote..l-boe-pemberton-twppem-boro-vote-for-3)	1,962	1,803	132	27	0	0	0	159	0.00%	244.62%	65	0.53%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	27

Contest 'Local BOE-Riverside Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Riverside Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	84
overvotes	0	25	-25
undervotes	0	397	-397
num_ballots	1,789	427	1,362
tot_votes	3,217	809	2,408
writeins	14	8	6
gray_eval	0
margin	146	12
winners	['NP - Bridget WINERING', 'NP - Rebecca EILER', 'NP - Julie SIERRA']	['NP - Bridget WINERING', 'NP - Julie SIERRA', 'NP - Rebecca EILER']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Bridget WINERING	862	211	651	26.8%
NP - Rebecca EILER	833	199	634	25.9%
NP - Julie SIERRA	827	204	623	25.7%
NP - Deborah A. GRAF	681	187	494	21.2%
writeins	14	8	6

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
Local BOE-Riverside Twp (Vote For 3)	427	398	25	4	0	0	0	29	0.00%	19.86%	146	4.54%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	4

Contest 'Riverton Borough Council (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Riverton Borough Council (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	85
overvotes	0	1	-1
undervotes	0	179	-179
num_ballots	1,298	314	984
tot_votes	2,114	447	1,667
writeins	37	14	23
gray_eval	0
margin	56	26
winners	['REP - Nicole RAFTER', 'REP - Kirk FULLERTON']	['DEM - Hal FEINSTEIN', 'REP - Nicole RAFTER']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
REP - Nicole RAFTER	761	124	637	36.0%
REP - Kirk FULLERTON	686	98	588	32.5%
DEM - Hal FEINSTEIN	630	211	419	29.8%
writeins	37	14	23

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Riverton Borough Council (Vote For 2)]..st-riverton-borough-council-vote-for-2)	314	300	1	13	0	0	0	14	0.00%	25.00%	56	2.65%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	13

Contest 'Local BOE-Southampton Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Southampton Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	90
overvotes	0	61	-61
undervotes	0	1,411	-1411
num_ballots	5,059	1,440	3,619
tot_votes	9,901	2,726	7,175
writeins	56	31	25
gray_eval	0
margin	7	34
winners	['NP - Jeffrey E. HICKS', 'NP - Irving BODINE III', 'NP - Kit APPLEGATE']	['NP - Jeffrey E. HICKS', 'NP - Suzanne PHILLIPS', 'NP - Kit APPLEGATE']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Jeffrey E. HICKS	2,097	626	1,471	21.2%
NP - Irving BODINE III	2,087	496	1,591	21.1%
NP - Kit APPLEGATE	1,996	530	1,466	20.2%
NP - Suzanne PHILLIPS	1,989	605	1,384	20.1%
NP - Stephen CHADWICK	1,676	438	1,238	16.9%
writeins	56	31	25

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Southampton Twp (Vote For 3)..t-local-boe-southampton-twp-vote-for-3)	1,440	1,356	61	22	0	1	0	84	0.00%	1200.00%	7	0.07%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	22
x_x_gry	1

Contest 'Local BOE-Tabernacle Twp (Vote For 3)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Local BOE-Tabernacle Twp (Vote For 3)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	3
contest_id	98
overvotes	0	27	-27
undervotes	0	687	-687
num_ballots	3,238	771	2,467
tot_votes	6,514	1,545	4,969
writeins	26	15	11
gray_eval	0
margin	78	20
winners	['NP - Lauren FANTI', 'NP - Victoria SHOEMAKER', 'NP - Jonathan J. GRUBB']	['NP - Victoria SHOEMAKER', 'NP - Gail COREY', 'NP - Megan CHAMBERLAIN']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - Lauren FANTI	1,203	202	1,001	18.5%
NP - Victoria SHOEMAKER	1,169	333	836	17.9%
NP - Jonathan J. GRUBB	1,085	186	899	16.7%
NP - John T. HARBOURT	1,007	183	824	15.5%
NP - Gail COREY	829	249	580	12.7%
NP - Megan CHAMBERLAIN	610	222	388	9.4%
NP - Jennifer TYLER	585	155	430	9.0%
writeins	26	15	11

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Local BOE-Tabernacle Twp (Vote For 3)]..st-local-boe-tabernacle-twp-vote-for-3)	771	738	27	5	0	1	0	33	0.00%	42.31%	78	1.20%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	6

Contest 'Bordentown Twp FD1 Commissioners (Vote For 2)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Bordentown Twp FD1 Commissioners (Vote For 2)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	2
contest_id	113
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	475	-475
num_ballots	1,712	369	1,343
tot_votes	1,064	263	801
writeins	14	3	11
gray_eval	0
margin	14	3
winners	['NP - John D. KINSLEY Jr.', 'writeins']	['NP - John D. KINSLEY Jr.', 'writeins']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
NP - John D. KINSLEY Jr.	1,041	260	781	97.8%
writeins	14	3	11

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Bordentown Twp FD1 Commissioners (Vote..ntown-twp-fd1-commissioners-vote-for-2)	369	367	0	2	0	0	0	2	0.00%	14.29%	14	1.33%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
wi_wi	2

Contest 'Delran Local School Bond Proposal #1 (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Delran Local School Bond Proposal #1 (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	119
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	56	-56
num_ballots	5,809	1,493	4,316
tot_votes	5,258	1,437	3,821
writeins	40	0	40
gray_eval	0
margin	1,250	539
winners	['Yes']	['Yes']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
Yes	3,234	988	2,246	61.5%
No	1,984	449	1,535	37.7%
writeins	40		40

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Delran Local School Bond Proposal #1 (..ocal-school-bond-proposal-1-vote-for-1)	1,493	1,490	0	0	0	3	0	3	0.00%	0.24%	1,250	23.77%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
x_x_gry	3

Contest 'Delran Local School Bond Proposal #2 (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Delran Local School Bond Proposal #2 (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	120
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	87	-87
num_ballots	5,809	1,917	3,892
tot_votes	5,200	1,830	3,370
writeins	40	0	40
gray_eval	0
margin	1,136	624
winners	['Yes']	['Yes']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
Yes	3,148	1,227	1,921	60.5%
No	2,012	603	1,409	38.7%
writeins	40		40

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Delran Local School Bond Proposal #2 (..ocal-school-bond-proposal-2-vote-for-1)	1,917	1,916	0	0	0	1	0	1	0.00%	0.09%	1,136	21.85%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
x_x_gry	1

Contest 'Edgewater Park Municipal Public Question (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Edgewater Park Municipal Public Question (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	121
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	65	-65
num_ballots	2,463	741	1,722
tot_votes	2,135	676	1,459
writeins	40	0	40
gray_eval	0
margin	85	70
winners	['No']	['Yes']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
No	1,090	303	787	51.1%
Yes	1,005	373	632	47.1%
writeins	40		40

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Edgewater Park Municipal Public Questi..k-municipal-public-question-vote-for-1)	741	741	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	85	3.98%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Lumberton Municipal Public Question (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Lumberton Municipal Public Question (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	122
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	94	-94
num_ballots	4,670	1,382	3,288
tot_votes	4,099	1,288	2,811
writeins	40	0	40
gray_eval	0
margin	481	408
winners	['Yes']	['Yes']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
Yes	2,270	848	1,422	55.4%
No	1,789	440	1,349	43.6%
writeins	40		40

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Lumberton Municipal Public Question (V..n-municipal-public-question-vote-for-1)	1,382	1,382	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%	481	11.73%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Tabernacle Local School District Question (Vote For 1)'

The following results are from the CVR but only including those ballots included in the audit. Missing ballot images are not included in these totals.

Contest: Tabernacle Local School District Question (Vote For 1)

parameter	Results	Audit (source)	Diff
vote_for	1
contest_id	123
overvotes	0	0	0
undervotes	0	40	-40
num_ballots	3,238	771	2,467
tot_votes	2,821	731	2,090
writeins	40	0	40
gray_eval	0
margin	467	197
winners	['Yes']	['Yes']

option	Results	Audit (source)	Diff	Results share
Yes	1,624	464	1,160	57.6%
No	1,157	267	890	41.0%
writeins	40		40

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

Contest	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Margin	Variant% of Margin	Vote Margin	Margin%
[Tabernacle Local School District Quest..al-school-district-question-vote-for-1)	771	770	0	0	0	1	0	1	0.00%	0.21%	467	16.55%

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Group	Sheets
x_x_gry	1

Precinct Report

Please note that the figures in this table are by ballot, rather than by contest, and the %Disagree is the number of cases among the ballots in the group rather than of a margin, since these cases are among all the contests in the precinct.

To reduce the report size, precinct details are limited to those precincts that were highlighted or are included in the setting 'cmpcvr_report_include_precincts'.

Precinct	Style	Total	Agreed & NonVariant	Agreed Overvotes	Agreed Write-ins	Agreed Blank	No CVR	Gray Only	Disagreed	All Variants	Disagreed% of Total	Variant% of Total	Disagreed Examples
Total:		0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00%	0.00%

Discrepancy Report

2022 General Election, Burlington County, NJ

Audit Engine version:'20e5a4f'

Table of Contents

Introduction

Definitions

Record Types Used by AuditEngine

High Level Reconciliation

Metadata Summary

Summary of Discrepancy Records

High Level Reconciliation

AuditEngine Flagged

Contest Variants Breakdown

Non additive Groups

Ballot Variants

Gray-flagged agreed votes.

Variant list for group:'ov_rest_unadjudicated': first (upto) 50 of 2,295.

Relevant Settings

Contest Discrepancy Report

Contest 'U.S. House of Representatives: District 1 (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'U.S. House of Representatives: District 3 (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'General Assembly 12th Legislative District UNEX (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Sheriff (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'County Commissioners (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Local BOE- Bass River (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Local BOE-Beverly City (Vote For 2)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Bordentown Township Committee (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Bordentown Regional BOE-Bordentown Twp (Vote For 3)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Burlington City Council Ward 3 Unex (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Burlington City Bd of Island Mngrs-Manager (Vote For 3)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Chesterfield Township Committee (Vote For 2)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Local BOE-Cinnaminson Twp (Vote For 3)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Local BOE-Delanco Twp (Vote For 3)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Delran Township Council 1st Ward (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Eastampton Fire Commissioners (Vote For 2)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Local BOE-Eastampton Twp (Vote For 2)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Local BOE-Edgewater Park Twp (Vote For 3)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Mayor of Evesham Township (Vote For 1)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Evesham Township Council (Vote For 2)'

Summary of the comparison of the results of AuditEngine with the CVR.

The following contest variant groups not included in the detailed list below

Contest 'Local BOE-Evesham Twp (Vote For 3)'