Discrepancy Report

2022 General Primary Election, DeKalb County, GA

Audit Engine version:'v2.32.X'

Run Date: 2026-08-06 02:57:56.399960 Copyright (c) Citizens' Oversight


Return to Master Report Index


Table of Contents

Introduction

This report is the result by AuditEngine compared with the official Cast Vote Records (CVR), when those records are available. If not, then the report reflects the evaluation of the election by AuditEngine including reports of variants detected, such as write-ins, overvotes, and gray-flags.

The following table summarizes what is compared and any limitations. This is a general description which is not modified for this specific case:

Source Description
Audit The tabulation by AuditEngine without reference to the official CVR.
CVR If available, the CVR provides the official results by the voting system. This result may contain adjudications by election staff
Adjud. Audit Results of the audit with adjudications applied from the AdjudiTally app
Official Results Aggregated Results for each contest captured from parsed reports or manually entered.
Manual Count Manual counts from any manual counting activities that include all ballots for a contest of interest

One of the key differences between ballot image audits by AuditEngine and other types of auditing, is that the comparison occur for all ballots at the ballot level, between the results from AuditEngine and the official results

Definitions

Definitions

High Level Reconciliation

parameter images cvrs images-cvrs results results-images
num_files 2 2 0 0 0
raw_total 143,619 143,166 453 132,149 -11,470
repeated ballot_ids 0 0 0 0 0
net unique ballot_ids 143,619 143,166 453 132,149 -11,470
net unique BMD Ballots 128,318 0 0 0 0
repeated sheets 0 0 0 0 0
repeated BMD Ballots 0 0 0 0 0
repeated nonBMD Ballots 0 0 0 0 0
repeated residue 0 0 0 0 0
net unique sheets 143,619 143,166 453 132,149 -11,470
net unique sheets in common 143,166 143,166 0 0 0
net unique sheets not in common 453 0 0 0 0

Metadata Summary

Parameter Value
Election Name 2022 General Primary Election, DeKalb County, GA
Official Ballots Cast 132,149
Number of precincts 136
Number of parties 0
Number of contests 108
Number of styles 999
Number of hexstyles (patterns of contests) 239
Number of BMD ballots 128,318
Number of different sheets 2
---- Ballot Image Archives (BIAs) ---- --------------------
Number of BIA Ballot Archives 2
Unique ballot_ids in BIAs 143,619
Total number of records in BIAs 143,619
Num. kept repeated ballot_ids in BIAs 0
Num. skipped repeated ballot_ids in BIAs 0
Num. skipped repeated images 0
BIA_num (unique images) 143,619
cast_num == BIA_num? False
ballots cast > BIA by 0
ballots in BIA > cast by 11,470
---- Cast Vote Records (CVRs) ---- --------------------
Number of CVR files 2
Unique ballot_ids in CVRs 143,166
Total number of CVR records 143,166
Number of repeated CVR ballot_ids 0
Number of CVR records with multiple cards 0
ballotids in CVR == BIA? False
ballotids in BIA not in CVR 453
ballotids in CVR not in BIA 0
ballotids in CVR and also in BIA 143,166
ballotids in CVR or in BIA (union) 143,619
---- Metadata from Images (BLTs) ---- --------------------
BLT_unique_ballots_num 143,619
Total number of BLT bif records 143,619
Duplicate BLT ballot_ids 0
ballotids in BLT == BIA? True
ballots cast not in BLT -11,470
Number of card_codes 851
Number of ballots with no card_codes 128,773
Number of corrupted ballots 453

Sheet Count Summary

Sheet Count
0 133,375
1 9,791

Summary of Discrepancy Records

This first section is an election-wide review of the ballots that are considered

High Level Reconciliation

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description

Non-Variant Sheets
96,371 5,049,672 67.5% 74.1%
Ballot sheets which have no contest variants at all. Thus, they have no overvotes, write-ins or any gray-flags, and if compared, the evaluations by AuditEngine and the voting system are identical. Please note that undervotes are frequently present and are not considered a reported variation.


Variants Removed Sheets
46,439 1,691,038 32.5% 24.8%
Records of ballot sheets which originally contained variant contests, but where those variant contests have been logically 'removed' from the number of contests that remain on the sheets. The remaining contests and sheets listed here are 'agreed' and have no overvotes, writeins or gray_flags. The number of contests listed in this group are those that remain and are all plain (non-variant).


Subtotal Agreed
142,810 6,740,710 100.0% 98.9%
Total agreed or partially agreed sheets and total of agreed ballot-contests. These counts are accurate for both Sheets and Contests.


Contest Variants
- - 71,761 32.4% 1.1%
Ballot-Contests logically removed from Variants Removed Sheets that have variations at the contest level. These will be further broken down based on the reason for the variation. Contest Variants includes those contests with write-ins, overvotes, gray-flags, and disagreements when the evaluation is compared between that of AuditEngine and the voting system, and are not included in Non-Variant and Variants Removed Sheets, because they are logically removed.


Not Processed
356 - - - 0.25% 0.0%
Ballots that were NOT successfully processed by AuditEngine. These are generally due to images that are distorted due to 'stretching' of the image when the page is not evenly fed through the scanner, barcodes that were corrupted and unreliable, or BMD ballots that were not perfectly read using OCR.
Cleaning or replacing the scanner rollers can help to avoid distorted images.

See Unprocessed Ballots Report for details. Ex: 05012_00002_000001, 05012_00002_000002, 05012_00002_000003, 05012_00002_000004, 05012_00002_000005, 05012_00002_000007, 05012_00002_000008, 05012_00002_000009, 05012_00002_000010, 05012_00002_000011

Ballot Variants
- - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballot sheets that have deviations at the ballot level, style mismatch, no-cvr, or blank).


Images Missing
0 - - - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballots that exist in the CVR but are not available as ballot images.

Total 142,810 6,812,471

AuditEngine Flagged

If no CVR is available for comparison, then these groups are used to drive adjudication to fine tune the result from AuditEngine. These sets only include ballots with images.

The group 'ae_uncategorized' were classified as variants based on cvr comparison and not included in the cases detected without any cvr comparison. It is common for this to be a fairly large number of variants. These are analyzed separately below.

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description
wi 180 389 0.35% 0.54% Audit Writeins: Contests per AuditEngine that have writeins and are NOT flagged as 'gray' (NO BMDs).
bmd_wi 2,197 5,350 4.3% 7.5% Audit Writeins: Contests per AuditEngine that have writeins and are NOT flagged as 'gray' (BMDs only).
wi_gry 651 702 1.3% 0.98% Audit Writeins: Contests per AuditEngine that have writeins and ARE flagged as 'gray' (may be BMDs).
ov 144 158 0.28% 0.22% Audit Overvotes: Contests per AuditEngine that are overvoted, are not writeins, and are NOT flagged as 'gray'.
ov_gry 1 3 0.0019% 0.0042% Audit Overvotes: Contests per AuditEngine that are overvoted, and ARE flagged as 'gray'.
uv_gry 1,061 1,925 2.1% 2.7% Audit Undervotes: Contests per AuditEngine that are undervoted, and ARE flagged as 'gray'.
x_gry 40,328 54,383 78.1% 75.8% Contests flagged as 'gray' by AuditEngine for further review, and do not include writeins or overvotes or undervotes.
ae_uncategorized 7,064 8,851 13.7% 12.3% These contest variants are not independently flagged by AuditEngine but are considered variant due to cvr comparison.
Total 51,626 71,761

Contest Variants Breakdown

This high-level breakdown is based on AuditEngine evaluation.

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description
wi_unadj 181 391 0.38% 0.54% Writeins per AuditEngine, unadjudicated (No BMDs).
bmd_wi_unadj 2,750 6,050 5.8% 8.4% Writeins per AuditEngine, unadjudicated (BMDs only).
ov_unadj 144 161 0.30% 0.22% Overvotes per AuditEngine, unadjudicated.
other_unadj 44,649 65,159 93.6% 90.8% True discrepancies not including writeins, or overvotes, unadjudicated.
cv2_uncategorized - - 0.0% 0.0% Any uncategorized cv1 groups
Total 47,724 71,761

Relevant Settings
include_bmd_ballot_type True
include_nonbmd_ballot_type True
cmpcvr_report_agreed_overvotes False
save_variant_ballots True
accept_adjudicated_writeins True

Contest Discrepancy Report

This report is the most revealing in terms of possible changes in the outcome of any contests. General terms (Write-in, Overvotes, Disagreed, etc.) are covered under Definitions above; this table's own columns have some additional meaning specific to it, covered below.

The shortlist below narrows this down to the contests most worth reviewing first. The complete table for every contest follows further down, for reference.

Column Glossary

To reduce the report size, precinct details are limited to the first few contests or those contests that were highlighted or are included in the setting 'cmpcvr_report_include_contests'. If you are interested in a specific contest, include it in the setting 'cmpcvr_report_include_contests', which is a list.

Contest Discrepancy Report - Summary

Start here. This narrows the full table below down to only those contests which were the most concerning when variants and disagreements were compared with the margin of victory.

Contest Total Agreed &
NonVariant
Agreed
Overvotes
Agreed
Write-ins
No
CVR
Gray
Only
Disagreed All
Variants
Disagreed%
of Margin
Variant%
of Margin
Vote
Margin
Margin%
US House of Representatives - District 4 - Dem 72,405 57,698 0 0 0 14,707 0 14,707 0.00% 21.75% 67,625 100.00%
County Commissioner D2 - Dem 18,648 13,683 1 0 0 1 4,964 4,965 764.87% 765.02% 649 4.61%
Board of Education D2 18,018 17,618 11 2 0 39 286 400 118.18% 165.29% 242 1.74%
Board of Education D4 18,129 17,709 1 2 0 14 359 420 8.80% 10.30% 4,079 26.51%
Board of Education D6 16,321 15,966 2 2 0 11 317 355 10.63% 11.90% 2,983 19.77%
Atlanta Public Improvement Bond (Public Safety, Parks and Rec) 9,223 425 0 0 0 7,496 1,302 8,798 18.49% 124.92% 7,043 79.00%
Full Contest Discrepancy Table -- every contest, for reference. The shortlist above already surfaces the ones most worth reviewing.
Contest Total Agreed &
NonVariant
Agreed
Overvotes
Agreed
Write-ins
No
CVR
Gray
Only
Disagreed All
Variants
Disagreed%
of Margin
Variant%
of Margin
Vote
Margin
Margin%
US Senate - Rep 30,788 30,780 0 0 0 8 0 8 0.00% 0.08% 9,472 32.22%
US Senate - Dem 102,244 102,231 2 0 0 11 2 13 0.00% 0.01% 96,090 94.67%
Governor - Rep 30,787 30,778 1 0 0 6 3 9 0.01% 0.04% 20,523 66.88%
Governor - Dem 102,208 102,192 0 0 0 14 2 16 0.00% 0.02% 101,101 100.00%
Lieutenant Governor - Rep 30,787 30,775 1 0 0 8 4 12 0.16% 0.49% 2,449 9.02%
Lieutenant Governor - Dem 102,208 102,127 40 0 0 39 42 81 0.32% 0.61% 13,266 13.74%
Secretary of State - Rep 30,787 30,742 1 0 0 43 2 45 0.01% 0.32% 14,083 46.97%
Secretary of State - Dem 102,208 102,133 5 0 0 68 7 75 0.02% 0.18% 42,519 43.37%
Attorney General - Rep 30,787 30,756 0 0 0 31 0 31 0.00% 0.21% 14,844 52.90%
Attorney General - Dem 102,208 102,195 0 0 0 12 1 13 0.00% 0.02% 61,266 64.00%
Commissioner of Agriculture - Rep 30,787 30,784 0 0 0 2 1 3 0.00% 0.01% 22,499 100.00%
Commissioner of Agriculture - Dem 102,208 102,192 0 0 0 16 0 16 0.00% 0.06% 27,907 30.42%
Commissioner of Insurance - Rep 30,787 30,778 3 0 0 6 3 9 0.02% 0.06% 14,715 55.46%
Commissioner of Insurance - Dem 102,208 102,172 0 0 0 34 2 36 0.01% 0.20% 18,453 19.99%
State School Superintendent - Rep 30,787 30,779 0 0 0 7 1 8 0.01% 0.09% 9,057 34.55%
State School Superintendent - Dem 102,208 102,181 2 0 0 25 2 27 0.01% 0.07% 39,377 42.71%
Commissioner of Labor - Rep 30,787 30,780 1 0 0 6 1 7 0.02% 0.13% 5,237 22.78%
Commissioner of Labor - Dem 102,208 102,152 4 0 0 50 6 56 0.68% 6.33% 884 0.97%
PSC - District 2 - Rep 30,787 30,785 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00% 0.01% 22,637 100.00%
PSC - District 2 - Dem 102,208 102,201 1 0 0 6 1 7 0.00% 0.02% 28,142 31.74%
PSC - District 3 - Rep 30,787 30,784 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00% 0.01% 21,734 100.00%
PSC - District 3 - Dem 102,208 102,187 1 0 0 20 1 21 0.01% 0.15% 14,280 16.00%
US House of Representatives - District 4 - Rep 26,027 26,021 1 0 0 5 1 6 0.01% 0.06% 10,358 52.24%
US House of Representatives - District 4 - Dem 72,405 57,698 0 0 0 14,707 0 14,707 0.00% 21.75% 67,625 100.00%
US House of Representatives - District 5 - Rep 4,761 4,761 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 2,904 100.00%
US House of Representatives - District 5 - Dem 29,839 29,817 15 0 0 7 15 22 0.07% 0.10% 21,853 77.85%
State Senate - District 10 - Dem 15,785 15,784 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.01% 7,275 48.39%
State Senate - District 40 - Rep 13,413 13,411 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00% 0.02% 9,442 100.00%
State Senate - District 40 - Dem 10,905 10,904 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.01% 9,842 100.00%
State Senate - District 41 - Rep 6,013 6,013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 4,158 100.00%
State Senate - District 41 - Dem 20,921 20,919 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00% 0.01% 18,577 100.00%
State Senate - District 42 - Dem 29,320 29,319 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.00% 26,096 100.00%
State Senate - District 43 - Rep 281 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 216 100.00%
State Senate - District 43 - Dem 4,280 4,279 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.03% 3,268 80.85%
State Senate - District 44 - Dem 9,455 9,455 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 6,947 78.01%
State Senate - District 55 - Dem 11,542 11,542 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 6,678 60.33%
State House of Representatives - District 52 - Rep 2,760 2,760 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 1,879 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 52 - Dem 2,065 2,065 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 1,808 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 80 - Rep 5,934 5,934 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 4,256 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 80 - Dem 3,724 3,724 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 3,240 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 81 - Rep 5,075 5,074 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.03% 0.03% 3,383 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 81 - Dem 5,768 5,767 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.02% 5,147 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 82 - Rep 3,827 3,827 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 2,382 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 82 - Dem 8,409 8,409 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 7,635 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 83 - Rep 3,440 3,440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 2,427 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 83 - Dem 3,273 3,273 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 2,860 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 84 - Dem 12,819 12,814 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00% 0.07% 7,353 63.24%
State House of Representatives - District 85 - Dem 6,997 6,996 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.03% 3,066 47.71%
State House of Representatives - District 86 - Rep 919 919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 632 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 86 - Dem 6,958 6,957 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.53% 190 2.97%
State House of Representatives - District 87 - Dem 7,250 7,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 6,739 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 88 - Rep 1,945 1,944 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.07% 0.07% 1,335 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 88 - Dem 6,873 6,873 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 2,035 31.11%
State House of Representatives - District 89 - Rep 1,649 1,649 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 991 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 89 - Dem 11,120 11,120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 10,065 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 90 - Rep 1,092 1,091 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.15% 666 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 90 - Dem 12,316 12,310 3 0 0 3 3 6 0.33% 0.66% 911 8.10%
State House of Representatives - District 91 - Dem 3,696 3,696 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 2,760 78.41%
State House of Representatives - District 92 - Dem 2,269 2,269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 1,523 71.94%
State House of Representatives - District 93 - Dem 956 955 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00% 0.19% 521 57.06%
State House of Representatives - District 94 - Dem 5,436 5,436 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 5,016 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 95 - Rep 156 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 107 100.00%
State House of Representatives - District 95 - Dem 2,279 2,279 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 2,092 100.00%
County Commissioner D2 - Dem 18,648 13,683 1 0 0 1 4,964 4,965 764.87% 765.02% 649 4.61%
County Commissioner D3 - Dem 29,402 29,393 0 0 0 9 0 9 0.00% 0.06% 15,852 57.71%
County Commissioner D7 - Dem 56,374 56,349 8 0 0 17 8 25 0.02% 0.08% 32,378 61.13%
Rep Party Question 1 30,785 30,762 1 0 0 22 1 23 0.01% 0.14% 16,763 56.36%
Rep Party Question 2 30,785 30,750 0 0 0 35 0 35 0.00% 0.25% 14,055 47.45%
Rep Party Question 3 30,785 30,749 0 0 0 34 2 36 0.02% 0.33% 10,769 37.19%
Rep Party Question 4 30,785 30,769 0 0 0 16 0 16 0.00% 0.09% 17,695 62.40%
Rep Party Question 5 30,785 30,703 0 0 0 82 0 82 0.00% 0.37% 22,096 74.95%
Rep Party Question 6 30,785 30,763 0 0 0 22 0 22 0.00% 0.11% 19,510 66.92%
Rep Party Question 7 30,785 30,737 0 0 0 47 1 48 0.01% 0.62% 7,769 26.31%
Rep Party Question 8 30,785 30,745 1 0 0 39 1 40 0.01% 0.26% 15,268 52.02%
Rep Party Question 9 (Local) 30,785 30,734 0 0 0 51 0 51 0.00% 0.91% 5,604 19.27%
Rep Party Question 10 (Local) 30,785 30,683 0 0 0 102 0 102 0.00% 0.64% 15,921 54.83%
Rep Party Question 11 (Local) 30,785 30,697 0 0 0 87 1 88 0.01% 0.56% 15,762 54.56%
Rep Party Question 12 (Local) 30,785 30,752 1 0 0 31 2 33 0.02% 0.27% 12,346 43.13%
Rep Party Question 13 (Local) 30,785 30,747 0 0 0 36 2 38 0.01% 0.27% 14,233 49.19%
Dem Party Question 1 102,209 102,059 2 0 0 144 6 150 0.01% 0.21% 70,593 70.06%
Dem Party Question 2 102,209 102,107 0 0 0 92 10 102 0.01% 0.11% 94,498 93.38%
Dem Party Question 3 102,209 102,143 2 0 0 62 4 66 0.00% 0.07% 95,449 94.26%
Dem Party Question 4 102,209 102,096 0 0 0 111 2 113 0.00% 0.15% 76,777 77.29%
Dem Party Question 5 102,209 102,106 1 0 0 100 3 103 0.00% 0.13% 80,199 79.75%
Dem Party Question 6 102,209 102,101 1 0 0 107 1 108 0.00% 0.11% 97,251 96.15%
Dem Party Question 7 102,209 102,094 1 0 0 111 4 115 0.00% 0.12% 95,336 94.32%
Dem Party Question 8 102,209 102,062 0 0 0 145 2 147 0.00% 0.21% 68,596 68.12%
Dem Party Question 9 102,209 102,109 0 0 0 99 1 100 0.00% 0.10% 96,274 95.71%
Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (Colvin) 135,379 134,816 6 6 0 29 11 563 0.03% 1.49% 37,910 32.48%
Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (LaGrua) 135,379 134,397 3 51 0 27 6 982 0.01% 0.89% 110,469 100.00%
Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (McMillian) 135,379 134,536 4 37 0 138 6 843 0.01% 0.76% 110,567 100.00%
Judge - Court of Appeals of Georgia (Barnes) 135,379 128,890 2 35 0 5,926 23 6,489 0.02% 5.88% 110,429 100.00%
Judge - Court of Appeals of Georgia (McFadden) 135,379 123,352 4 29 0 11,555 39 12,027 0.04% 10.99% 109,406 100.00%
Judge - Court of Appeals of Georgia (Pipkin) 135,379 125,575 3 33 0 9,387 30 9,804 0.03% 9.02% 108,659 100.00%
Judge - Superior Court - Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit (Asha Jackson) 135,379 134,807 2 25 0 159 46 572 0.04% 0.52% 109,732 100.00%
Judge - Superior Court - Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit (Latisha Jackson) 135,379 134,897 1 29 0 55 45 482 0.04% 0.44% 109,719 100.00%
Judge - Superior Court - Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit (Johnson) 135,378 134,822 6 40 0 81 124 556 0.11% 0.51% 108,990 100.00%
State Court Judge (Alexander) 135,378 134,715 7 26 0 354 119 663 0.11% 0.61% 109,449 100.00%
State Court Judge (Anderson) 135,378 134,790 1 28 0 292 115 588 0.11% 0.54% 109,098 100.00%
State Court Judge (Panos) 135,378 132,831 3 26 0 1,984 329 2,547 0.30% 2.34% 108,821 100.00%
State Court Judge (Wong) 135,378 132,273 1 17 0 391 2,393 3,105 2.17% 2.82% 110,064 100.00%
Board of Education D2 18,018 17,618 11 2 0 39 286 400 118.18% 165.29% 242 1.74%
Board of Education D4 18,129 17,709 1 2 0 14 359 420 8.80% 10.30% 4,079 26.51%
Board of Education D6 16,321 15,966 2 2 0 11 317 355 10.63% 11.90% 2,983 19.77%
Mayor - Stonecrest 9,930 9,443 1 1 0 252 210 487 4.73% 10.96% 4,442 46.24%
Atlanta TSPLOST 9,223 9,112 0 0 0 19 92 111 1.71% 2.06% 5,382 60.17%
Atlanta Public Improvement Bond (Roads, Sidewalks, Paths and Trails) 9,223 9,130 0 0 0 5 88 93 1.15% 1.22% 7,628 85.00%
Atlanta Public Improvement Bond (Public Safety, Parks and Rec) 9,223 425 0 0 0 7,496 1,302 8,798 18.49% 124.92% 7,043 79.00%
Total: 5,121,433 5,049,672 158 389 0 54,973 11,057 71,761 0.34% 2.19% 3,273,548

For per-ballot evidence images and the full contest-by-contest, group-by-group detail, see the Contest Discrepancy Detail Report.

Precinct Discrepancy Report

Unprocessed Ballots Report

Supporting Detail

How contests came to be classified as disagreed, write-ins, overvotes, gray-flagged, or ballot-level variants.

Disagreed_Groups

NORMAL DISAGREED (No writeins or overvotes) Unadjudicated and Adjudicated, BMD and nonBMD.

Group x_y_x are the votes correctly interpreted by AuditEngine but incorrectly interpreted by the voting system, but corrected in Adjudication. x_y_y are apparently adjudicated but are actually not reviewed, and so they tend to also be correctly interpreted by AuditEngine. Here we also consider disagreed undervotes, which are too common to consider variants if they are not disagreed.

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description
x_y 1 1 0.012% 0.0097% Unadjudicated disagreed contests with votes (gray OK, No BMDs)
x_uv 78 89 0.91% 0.86% Unadjudicated disagreed contests with CVR undervotes (gray OK, No BMDs)
x_ov - - 0.0% 0.0% Unadjudicated disagreed contests with CVR undervotes, (gray OK, No BMDs) (x_ov).
uv_x 6 9 0.070% 0.087% Unadjudicated disagreed undervotes with CVR votes (uv_x) No BMDs
bmd_x_y 4,032 4,049 47.0% 39.2% Unadjudicated disagreed contests with votes (gray OK, Only BMDs)
bmd_x_uv 2,156 2,162 25.1% 20.9% Unadjudicated disagreed contests with CVR undervotes (gray OK, Only BMDs). This can occur if the AuditEngine BMD OCR parsing is making an error.
bmd_uv_x 2,165 3,815 25.2% 36.9% Unadjudicated disagreed undervotes with CVR votes (bmd_uv_x). Only BMDs This can occur if the AuditEngine BMD OCR parsing is making an error.
unadj_uncategorized 141 211 1.6% 2.0% Unadjudicated uncategorized. Ex: 01170_00000_296448, 01600_00000_426108, 04201_00000_022121, 01440_00000_517301, 04101_00000_874828, 04065_00000_938543, 00580_00000_717729, 04065_00000_017435, 04066_00000_323457, 00790_00000_482662
uncategorized - - 0.0% 0.0% Contest Variants that have not been categorized into any groups. This should be empty.
Total 8,579 10,336

Ballot Variants

Completely blank ballots, ballots with no CVR record, corrupted images, and any that we find had a different style in CVR from the ballot.

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description

Ballot Variants
- - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballot sheets that have deviations at the ballot level, style mismatch, no-cvr, or blank).


Blank Sheets
- - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballot sheets where no selections are detected.


Distorted
- - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballot images that have been detected as distorted, due to slippage during scanning or damaged original, and cannot be automatically evaluated.


No CVR
0 - - - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballot sheets that have images but no CVR record and cannot be compared.


Images Missing
0 - - - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballots that exist in the CVR but are not available as ballot images.


Not Processed
356 - - - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballots that were NOT successfully processed by AuditEngine. These are generally due to images that are distorted due to 'stretching' of the image when the page is not evenly fed through the scanner, barcodes that were corrupted and unreliable, or BMD ballots that were not perfectly read using OCR.
Cleaning or replacing the scanner rollers can help to avoid distorted images.

See Unprocessed Ballots Report for details. Ex: 05012_00002_000001, 05012_00002_000002, 05012_00002_000003, 05012_00002_000004, 05012_00002_000005, 05012_00002_000007, 05012_00002_000008, 05012_00002_000009, 05012_00002_000010, 05012_00002_000011

bv_uncategorized
- - 0.0% 0.0%
Uncategorized Ballot Variants . This should be empty.

Non Additive Groups

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description

Contest Variants
46,438 71,761 83.9% 86.6%
Ballot-Contests logically removed from Variants Removed Sheets that have variations at the contest level. These will be further broken down based on the reason for the variation. Contest Variants includes those contests with write-ins, overvotes, gray-flags, and disagreements when the evaluation is compared between that of AuditEngine and the voting system, and are not included in Non-Variant and Variants Removed Sheets, because they are logically removed.


Disagreed (combined groups)
8,891 11,066 16.1% 13.4%
All contests that do not agree between the CVR and Audit result, and may include write-ins, overvotes and be flagged as gray. This category is only available if the CVR is available for comparison at the ballot level.


Ballot Variants
- - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballot sheets that have deviations at the ballot level, style mismatch, no-cvr, or blank).

uncategorized - - 0.0% 0.0% Contest Variants that have not been categorized into any groups. This should be empty.

Blank Sheets
- - 0.0% 0.0%
Ballot sheets where no selections are detected.

Write-ins detailed

Write-ins are normally the vast majority of variants.

If adjudication records are not provided by the voting system, then write-ins may still have been reviewed by election staff prior to producing the CVR, and there is no indication of that processing in the data. However, if it appears that all writeins that are blank are marked as an undervote, and all writeins that are fully legitimate are marked as a vote for the appropriate listed candidate or qualified writein candidate, then it is likely that all write-ins have been reviewed by the election staff.

If adjudication is performed by the voting system and modified records provided, the fact that an adjudication record does not exist does not necessarily mean they were not reviewed and then confirmed. Conversely, just because an adjudication record does exist does not mean that contest was inspected, unless the 'modified' record differs from the 'original' record. There is no adjudication marking in the modified record that allows an adjudicator to inspect the record and mark it as confirmed.

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description
wi_wi - - 0.0% 0.0%
Agreed Writeins (No BMDs, gray OK).

bmd_wi_wi - - 0.0% 0.0%
Agreed Writeins (BMD Only, gray OK). BMD writeins are keyed in, making these easier for staff to capture and review.

wi_uv 12 20 0.41% 0.31%
Writeins detected by AuditEngine and CVR lists as an undervote (wi_uv) (gray OK, bmds OK).
In these cases, the write-in may have been adjudicated and recorded as an undervote if the name written in is blank or is not a qualified
write-in candidate.

wi_ov - - 0.0% 0.0%
Writeins detected by AuditEngine and CVR lists as an overvote (wi_ov) (gray OK) (NO BMDs).

wi_x 516 541 17.5% 8.4%
Writeins detected by AuditEngine and CVR lists as a vote (wi_x) (gray OK) (BMDs OK).
In these cases, the write-in may have been adjudicated and recorded as a vote for a qualified write-in candidate.

subtotal_main_writeins 528 561 17.9% 8.7% Subtotal of the most frequently encountered write-in groups
subtotal_other_writeins 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Subtotal of 'other' write-in groups
wi_rest_unadj 2,414 5,880 82.1% 91.3%
Writeins uncategorized (gray OK) (BMDs OK).

Total 2,942 6,441

Variant list for group:'wi_rest_unadj': first (upto) 10 of 5,880.

ballot_id bmd? contest a==co a_wi a_uv a_ov a_v a_gy co_wi co_uv co_ov co_v
04251_00000_298118 1 State Court Judge (Alexander) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01330_00000_129141 1 Board of Education D6 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01330_00000_157185 1 Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (LaGrua) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01330_00000_157185 1 Judge - Court of Appeals of Georgia (Barnes) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01330_00000_270446 1 Judge - Court of Appeals of Georgia (McFadden) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01330_00000_311669 1 Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (Colvin) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01170_00000_278291 1 Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (Colvin) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01170_00000_278291 1 Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (LaGrua) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01170_00000_278291 1 Justice - Supreme Court of Georgia (McMillian) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01170_00000_278291 1 Judge - Court of Appeals of Georgia (Barnes) 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Overvotes detailed

Overvotes will only occur on hand-marked ballots and may have already been reviewed by election staff.

When adjudication records are provided, election workers sometimes mark overvotes as undervotes during adjudication, to keep track of whether an overvote has been reviewed. Any overvotes that are converted to votes will no longer have an overvote marking, and those that are indeed overvotes are converted to undervote marking. Although this may be a workable approach, it unfortunately distorts the statistics regarding overvotes, because normal reporting will say that no overvotes exist.

When this practice is used, and if adjudication is used, 'ov_ov_uv' is an actively confirmed overvote, while 'ov_ov_ov' means only that the adjudication record was created, but we don't know if this contest was reviewed and confirmed.

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description
ov_ov - - 0.0% 0.0% Agreed overvotes (ov_ov) (gray OK).
ov_uv 91 104 62.8% 64.6% Overvotes described as undervotes in CVR (ov_uv) (gray OK). May not be considered disagreed.
ov_x 53 56 36.6% 34.8% Unadjudicated Disagreed overvotes, CVR votes (ov_x) (gray OK).
ov_rest_unadj 1 1 0.69% 0.62% Unadjudicated overvotes uncategorized (gray OK) (No BMDs).
Total 145 161

Variant list for group:'ov_rest_unadj': first (upto) 10 of 1.

ballot_id bmd? contest a==co a_wi a_uv a_ov a_v a_gy co_wi co_uv co_ov co_v
04000_00023_000028 0 Judge - Court of Appeals of Georgia (McFadden) 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gray-Flagged

These contests are marked as variants only because AuditEngine noted ambiguous votes or heuristic vote resolution.

Record Type Sheets Ballot
Contests
% of Sheets % of Contests Description
x_x_gry 39,166 53,060 97.6% 96.8% Unadjudicated agreed contests with votes, marked gray_eval
uv_uv_gry 945 1,763 2.4% 3.2% Unadjudicated Agreed undervotes, flagged as gray (uv_uv_gry).
Total 40,111 54,823